Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37251444›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Intestinal microbial 16S sequencing and LC-MS metabonomic analysis revealed differences between young and old cats.

Tongguan Tian, Yuefan Zhou, Yixin Xu, Yanping Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tongguan TianNourse Centre for Pet Nutrition, Wuhu, 241200, China.
Yuefan ZhouNourse Centre for Pet Nutrition, Wuhu, 241200, China.
Yixin XuNourse Centre for Pet Nutrition, Wuhu, 241200, China.
Yanping XuNourse Centre for Pet Nutrition, Wuhu, 241200, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the progress of society, the health problems of pets have attracted more and more attention. Recent studies have shown that intestinal microflora and related fecal metabolites play a crucial role in the healthy growth of cats. However, the potential role and related metabolic characteristics of gut microbiota in different age groups of pet cats need to be further clarified. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to analyze the intestinal microbial composition of young and old cats. LC-MS metabonomic analysis is used to characterize the changes in the metabolic spectrum in feces. The potential relationship between intestinal microorganisms and metabolites, as well as the differences in different age groups, were studied. The species composition of intestinal microflora in the young group and old group is significantly different, T-test algorithm shows 36 different ASVs and 8 different genuses, while the Wilcoxon algorithm shows 81 different ASVs and 17 different genuses. The metabolomics analysis identified 537 kinds of fecal metabolites, which are rich in differences between young and old cats, and may be potential biomarkers indicating the health of cats. 16S rRNA analysis showed significant differences in fructose and mannose metabolism, while metabonomics KEGG analysis showed significant difference in choline metabolism in cancer. Our study compared the differences between the intestinal microbiome and fecal metabolites in young and old cats. This difference provides a new direction for further exploring the relationship between the composition and metabolism of intestinal microbiota in cats of different age groups. It also provides a reference for cat health research.

Indexed as

CatsLC-MSMetabonomicMicrobial 16S

Identifiers

PMID37251444
PMCPMC10220381
OpenAlexW4377086726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.