Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37252829›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2023

Efficacy and safety of zuranolone in Japanese adults with major depressive disorder: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial.

Masaki Kato, Kazuyuki Nakagome, Takamichi Baba, Takuhiro Sonoyama, Daiki Okutsu, Hideki Yamanaka, Ryosuke Shimizu, Tomoko Motomiya, Takeshi Inoue

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masaki KatoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-7272
Kazuyuki NakagomeDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-8180
Takamichi BabaBiostatistics Center, Drug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Takuhiro SonoyamaMedical Science Department, Drug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Daiki OkutsuClinical Research Department, Drug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Hideki YamanakaClinical Research Department, Drug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Ryosuke ShimizuClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacokinetics, Drug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Tomoko MotomiyaProject Management Department, Drug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-4263
Takeshi InoueDepartment of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-1289
Shionogi (Japan) · JPKansai Medical University · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPTokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

Shionogi & Co., Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oral, once-daily, 14-day treatment course of zuranolone in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

methodsThis multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized eligible patients (1:1:1) to receive oral zuranolone 20 mg, zuranolone 30 mg, or placebo once daily for 14 days (treatment-period), followed by two 6-week follow-up periods. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total score on Day 15.

resultsOverall, 250 patients (enrolled: 07/07/2020-05/26/2021) were randomized to receive placebo (n = 83), zuranolone 20 mg (n = 85), or zuranolone 30 mg (n = 82). The demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. The adjusted mean (standard error) change from baseline in the HAMD-17 total score on Day 15 was -6.22 (0.62), -8.14 (0.62), and - 8.31 (0.63) in the placebo, zuranolone 20-mg, and zuranolone 30-mg groups, respectively. Significant differences in the adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) for zuranolone 20 mg versus placebo (-1.92; [-3.65, -0.19]; P = 0.0296) and zuranolone 30 mg versus placebo (-2.09; [-3.83, -0.35]; P = 0.0190) groups were observed on Day 15, and also as early as Day 3. A nonsignificant yet distinct drug-placebo separation was observed during follow-up. Somnolence (placebo [3.7%], zuranolone 20 mg [10.6%], and zuranolone 30 mg [20.7%]) and dizziness (3.7%, 9.4%, and 9.8%, respectively) were more common with zuranolone.

conclusionOral zuranolone was safe and demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms, as assessed by HAMD-17 total score change from baseline over 14 days in Japanese patients with MDD.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAdultDouble-Blind MethodEast Asian PeopleHumansPregnanolonePyrazolesTreatment OutcomePregnanolonePyrazoleszuranolonedepressive disorderJapanphase 2safetyzuranolone

Identifiers

PMID37252829
PMCPMC11488630
OpenAlexW4378782342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.