Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37255987›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2023

Lasmiditan in Japanese Patients with Common Migraine Comorbidities or Concomitant Medications: A Post Hoc Safety and Efficacy Analysis from the MONONOFU Study.

Shigekazu Kitamura, Noboru Imai, Yuka Tanji, Akichika Ozeki, Mika Komori

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03962738 (RandoMized, DOuble-bliNd, PlacebO-coNtrolled Trial Of Lasmiditan in a Single Migraine Attack in Japanese Patients SuFfering From Migraine With or WithoUt Aura - the MONONOFU Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03962738 phase2completednot on this map

RandoMized, DOuble-bliNd, PlacebO-coNtrolled Trial Of Lasmiditan in a Single Migraine Attack in Japanese Patients SuFfering From Migraine With or WithoUt Aura - the MONONOFU Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2019 to 2020Enrolled846ConditionsMigraineArmsLasmiditan, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shigekazu KitamuraDepartment of Neurology, Konan Kakogawa Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7162-4265
Noboru ImaiDepartment of Neurology, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8745-0391
Yuka TanjiJapan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Akichika OzekiJapan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5510-4219
Mika KomoriJapan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-1296
Eli Lilly (Japan) · JPEdogawa Hospital · JPShizuoka Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Migraine is often comorbid with other disorders. People with migraine may be prescribed one or more concomitant medications. This post hoc analysis assessed the safety and efficacy of lasmiditan in Japanese people with migraine comorbidities or using concomitant medications. Patients and Methods: The MONONOFU study was a Phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of lasmiditan for acute migraine treatment in Japanese adults. Patients reported comorbidities (pre-existing or coexisting conditions) during screening. Concomitant medications (any drugs taken ±48 hours of the study drug) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded in a paper diary. Study drug efficacy (pain freedom 2 hours after administration of study drug) was reported in an eDiary. Logistic regression models were used for subgroup analyses of safety (incidence of TEAEs) and efficacy (pain freedom at 2 hours post dose) of lasmiditan in relation to presence/absence of comorbidities, and safety in relation to concomitant medications. Results: Common comorbidities (occurring in ≥10% of any lasmiditan dose group) were seasonal allergies, allergic rhinitis, tension-type headache, cervicobrachial syndrome, dysmenorrhea, nasopharyngitis, musculoskeletal stiffness, chronic gastritis, constipation, and insomnia. There was no significant interaction of treatment with comorbidity for safety or efficacy. There was also no significant interaction between treatment and concomitant medication groups of special interest (acetaminophen/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, triptans, antiemetics, central nervous system depressant medications, serotonergic medications, antiepileptics, antihypertensive medications, Chinese herbal medicines, and contraceptives) for incidence of TEAEs. Conclusion: In Japanese people with migraine, the safety of lasmiditan appeared to be independent of common comorbidities and concomitant medications; efficacy appeared to be independent of comorbid conditions. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03962738 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Indexed as

comorbiditydrug therapyheadacheJapanmigraine disorderssafety

Identifiers

PMID37255987
PMCPMC10226550
OpenAlexW4378232336

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.