Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37256457›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2023

Effect of sires' expected progeny difference for scrotal circumference and juvenile ADG on the puberty of crossbred beef heifers.

José Paulo Roman Barroso, Marcos Vinicius de Castro Ferraz Junior, Gabriela Bagio Oliveira, Alexandre Arantes Miszura, Analisa Vasques Bertoloni, André Storti Martins, Marcelo Baggio, Daniel Montanher Polizel, Janaina Socolovski Biava, Evandro Maia Ferreira and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

José Paulo Roman BarrosoDepartamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ/USP), Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brasil.
Marcos Vinicius de Castro Ferraz JuniorInstituto de Ciências Sociais, Educação e Zootecnia (ICSEZ)), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Parintins, AM, 69152-240, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6041-2539
Gabriela Bagio OliveiraDepartamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ/USP), Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brasil.
Alexandre Arantes MiszuraDepartamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ/USP), Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brasil.
Analisa Vasques BertoloniFaculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brasil.
André Storti MartinsDepartamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ/USP), Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brasil.
Marcelo BaggioDepartamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ/USP), Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brasil.
Daniel Montanher PolizelDepartamento de Biologia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Ilha Solteira, SP, 15385000, Brasil.
Janaina Socolovski BiavaFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (FMVZ/Unesp), Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brasil.
Evandro Maia FerreiraDepartamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" (ESALQ/USP), Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brasil.
Alexandre Vaz PiresDepartamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ/USP), Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-000, Brasil. pires.1@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early attainment of puberty in heifers is essential for the profitability of the cow-calf farm. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of juvenile average daily gain (ADG) and sire's expected progeny difference (EPD) on puberty of crossbred beef heifers. Sixty Angus × Nellore heifers early weaned (age = 102 ± 4.3 d; initial BW = 103 ± 4.7 kg) were used in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The factor 1 was the sire's EPD for scrotal circumference, in which heifers born from sires with positive EPD were considered precocious (P), and heifers born from sires with negative EPD were considered non-precocious (NP). The factor 2 was the high (HG; ADG = 0.9 kg; ad libitum) and medium ADG (MG; ADG = 0.7 kg) from 3

Indexed as

Animal FeedSexual MaturationAnimalsCattleDietFemaleWeaningCompensatory growthIGF-1InsulinPuberty rateSexual precocity

Identifiers

PMID37256457
OpenAlexW4378781670

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.