Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37258525›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2023

Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial.

Karen D Corbin, Elvis A Carnero, Blake Dirks, Daria Igudesman, Fanchao Yi, Andrew Marcus, Taylor L Davis, Richard E Pratley, Bruce E Rittmann, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02939703 (Integrating Quantitative Energetics Determines the Microbiome's Contribution to Energy Balance), which is not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02939703 nacompletednot on this map

Integrating Quantitative Energetics Determines the Microbiome's Contribution to Energy Balance

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealth Translational Research InstituteRan2017 to 2019Enrolled16ConditionsObesityArmsDiet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impacts of Lifestyle and Microbiota-Targeted Interventions for Overweight and Obesity on the Human Gut Microbiome: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The gut microbiota in malnutrition.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Work-Influenced Circadian Disruption Connected to Disease Risk but Not Microbiomes in a Cohort of Philadelphia Nurses.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen D CorbinAdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2065-0003
Elvis A CarneroAdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0442-4217
Blake DirksBiodesign Center for Health through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-5306
Daria IgudesmanAdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5209-4625
Fanchao YiAdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.
Andrew MarcusBiodesign Center for Health through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Taylor L DavisBiodesign Center for Health through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Richard E PratleyAdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.
Bruce E RittmannBiodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3678-149X
Rosa Krajmalnik-BrownBiodesign Center for Health through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. Dr.Rosy@asu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6064-3524
Steven R SmithAdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, FL, USA. Steven.R.Smith@AdventHealth.com.
Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes · USArizona State University · USDepartment of Embryology · US

Funding

Integrating quantitative energetics determines the microbiome's contribution to energy balanceR01DK105829 · NIDDK · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KRAJMALNIK-BROWN, ROSA, SMITH, STEVEN RICHARD · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome is emerging as a key modulator of human energy balance. Prior studies in humans lacked the environmental and dietary controls and precision required to quantitatively evaluate the contributions of the gut microbiome. Using a Microbiome Enhancer Diet (MBD) designed to deliver more dietary substrates to the colon and therefore modulate the gut microbiome, we quantified microbial and host contributions to human energy balance in a controlled feeding study with a randomized crossover design in young, healthy, weight stable males and females (NCT02939703). In a metabolic ward where the environment was strictly controlled, we measured energy intake, energy expenditure, and energy output (fecal and urinary). The primary endpoint was the within-participant difference in host metabolizable energy between experimental conditions [Control, Western Diet (WD) vs. MBD]. The secondary endpoints were enteroendocrine hormones, hunger/satiety, and food intake. Here we show that, compared to the WD, the MBD leads to an additional 116 ± 56 kcals (P < 0.0001) lost in feces daily and thus, lower metabolizable energy for the host (89.5 ± 0.73%; range 84.2-96.1% on the MBD vs. 95.4 ± 0.21%; range 94.1-97.0% on the WD; P < 0.0001) without changes in energy expenditure, hunger/satiety or food intake (P > 0.05). Microbial 16S rRNA gene copy number (a surrogate of biomass) increases (P < 0.0001), beta-diversity changes (whole genome shotgun sequencing; P = 0.02), and fermentation products increase (P < 0.01) on an MBD as compared to a WD along with significant changes in the host enteroendocrine system (P < 0.0001). The substantial interindividual variability in metabolizable energy on the MBD is explained in part by fecal SCFAs and biomass. Our results reveal the complex host-diet-microbiome interplay that modulates energy balance.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeDietDiet, WesternEnergy MetabolismFecesFemaleHumansMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37258525
PMCPMC10232526
OpenAlexW4378907284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.