SynthesisCurrent vascular pharmacology2024
Cardiovascular Protection of Aspirin in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Current vascular pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate aspirin's cardiovascular (CV) protective effect in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (up to December 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing aspirin with placebo in CKD patients for the prevention of CV disease (CVD). Efficacy outcomes included CVD, heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, CV and all-cause mortality; safety outcomes included major bleeding, minor bleeding, and renal events.
resultsSix RCTs and 6 observational studies, including 35,640 participants, met the inclusion criteria and reported relevant CV outcomes, with a mean follow-up of 46.83 months. The pooled data showed aspirin had no significant preventive effect on CVD events (RR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.27). However, CV mortality was significantly reduced in the aspirin group (RR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.95). Furthermore, aspirin use did not increase the risk of major bleeding and renal events but significantly increased minor bleeding events (RR=2.11; 95% CI, 1.30-3.44). Renal events were significantly increased after sensitivity analysis (RR=1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16).
conclusionAspirin did not prevent CV events, with a significantly increased risk of minor bleeding and renal events. Besides, aspirin use had no statistically significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality but had a statistically significant reduction in the risk of CV mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37259222What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.