Observational studyEuropean heart journal2023

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs. sitagliptin in heart failure and type 2 diabetes: an observational cohort study.

Edouard L Fu, Elisabetta Patorno, Brendan M Everett, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, Raisa Levin, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Rishi J Desai

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European heart journal, 2023. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 13 papers.

1number the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · t2d, heart_failurefeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.720.67 to 0.77
Initiation of SGLT2i vs. sitagliptin was associated with a lower risk of the primary composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.77].

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

DPP-4 inhibitors×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

3 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.99replicated · 2 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT01438814689 enrolled · 2011
OR 0.960.67 to 1.37

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

SGLT2 inhibitors×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

22 readable studies in this cell: 9 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 9 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
1 · no effect
NCT0546531762,197 enrolled · 2022
HR 0.750.65 to 0.86
NCT0399313226,774 enrolled · 2018
HR 1.010.91 to 1.11
NCT0173053417,190 enrolled · 2013
HR 0.930.84 to 1.03
NCT0493781616,746 enrolled · 2021
HR 1.000.83 to 1.20
NCT045096746,522 enrolled · 2020
HR 0.900.76 to 1.06
NCT036192136,263 enrolled · 2018
HR 0.820.73 to 0.92
NCT030579515,988 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.790.69 to 0.90
NCT019897545,813 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.720.55 to 0.94
NCT020657914,401 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.700.59 to 0.82
NCT010326294,330 enrolled · 2009
HR 0.930.78 to 1.12
NCT045647424,017 enrolled · 2020
Win Ratio (WR) 1.341.20 to 1.50
NCT030579773,730 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.750.65 to 0.86

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edouard L FuDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., BC-3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-6825
Elisabetta PatornoDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., BC-3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8809-9898
Brendan M EverettDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Muthiah VaduganathanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-1953
Scott D SolomonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-9597
Raisa LevinDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., BC-3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Sebastian SchneeweissDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., BC-3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2575-467X
Rishi J DesaiDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., BC-3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0299-7273
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Novel Approaches to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of Newly Marketed Diabetes Medications in Older Adults Considering Frailty and MultimorbidityK08AG055670 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Elisabetta Patorno · 2021 to 2021
$165k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG055670
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

aimsThe effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure (HF) in routine clinical practice is not extensively studied. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of SGLT2i vs. sitagliptin in older adults with HF and type 2 diabetes and to investigate whether there were any differences between agents within the SGLT2i class or for reduced and preserved ejection fraction. METHODS AND

resultsUsing Medicare claims data (April 2013 to December 2019), 16 253 SGLT2i initiators vs. 43 352 initiators of sitagliptin aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes and HF were included. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for HF or urgent visit requiring intravenous diuretics; secondary outcomes included its individual components. Propensity score fine stratification weighted Cox regression was used to adjust for 100 pre-exposure characteristics. Mean age was 74 years; 49.8% were women. Initiation of SGLT2i vs. sitagliptin was associated with a lower risk of the primary composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.77]. The adjusted HRs were 0.70 (0.63-0.78) for all-cause mortality, 0.64 (0.58-0.70) for hospitalization for HF, and 0.77 (0.69-0.86) for urgent visit requiring intravenous diuretics. Similar associations with the primary composite outcome were observed for all three agents within the SGLT2i class, for reduced and preserved ejection fraction, and subgroups based on demographics, comorbidities, and other HF treatments. Bias-calibrated HRs for the primary endpoint using negative and positive control outcomes ranged between 0.81 and 0.89, suggesting that the observed benefit could not be fully explained by residual confounding.

conclusionIn routine US clinical practice, SGLT2i demonstrated robust clinical effectiveness in older adults with HF and type 2 diabetes compared with sitagliptin, with no evidence of heterogeneity across the SGLT2i class or across ejection fraction.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Heart FailureSitagliptin PhosphateSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAgedBenzhydryl CompoundsCanagliflozinCohort StudiesFemaleGlucosidesHeart Failure, DiastolicHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicareTreatment OutcomeBenzhydryl CompoundsCanagliflozindapagliflozinempagliflozinGlucosidesSitagliptin PhosphateSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsCardiovascular diseasesCohort studiesHeart failureSodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID37259575
PMCPMC10290872
OpenAlexW4378953523

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.