Evidence mapPaperPMID 37260755Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of digital therapies in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Fan He, Yanjie Qi, Yuanyue Zhou, Aihua Cao, Xin Yue, Shuanfeng Fang, Yi Zheng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [Advances in the application of digital cognitive behavioral therapy in adolescent mental health issue interventions].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fan HeBeijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yanjie QiBeijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuanyue ZhouDepartment of Medical Psychology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Aihua CaoQilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xin YueMaiDeHaiKe Technology, Beijing, China.
Shuanfeng FangChildren's Hospital Affiliated, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yi ZhengBeijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that commonly occurs in childhood. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence for the efficacy of digital therapeutics in children and adolescents with ADHD. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), and Web of Science (science and social science citation index) databases for relevant studies and used Stata 15.0 software to carry out the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 31 studies involving 2169 participants (1665 boys and 504 girls) aged 4-17 years old were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that digital interventions improved the symptoms of inattention with an effect value of -0.20 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.36, -0.04) and decreased the continuous performance task (CPT) reaction time (effect, -0.40, 95% CI -0.73, -0.07) in ADHD patients. The score for impulsive hyperactivity was slightly decreased (effect, -0.07, 95% CI -0.23, 0.09). Moreover, executive function was improved (effect, 0.71, 95% CI 0.37, 1.04). The capability of working memory appeared to be increased (effect, 0.48, 95% CI 0.21, 0.76) between the two groups. Visual appraisal of the sensitivity analysis suggested the absence of heterogeneity, and no obvious publication bias was detected. Discussion: Based on the existing literature evidence, we conclude that digital therapy can be a promising therapeutic strategy for ADHD patients.

Indexed as

attention-deficit hyperactivity disorderdigital therapyexecutive functionimpulsive hyperactivityinattentionmeta-analysisworking memory

Identifiers

PMID37260755
PMCPMC10228751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.