Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37268951›Full record

SynthesisReproductive health2023

Prevalence, indications, and complications of caesarean section in health facilities across Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Itohan Osayande, Olakunmi Ogunyemi, Uchenna Gwacham-Anisiobi, Abimbola Olaniran, Sanni Yaya, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Analysis of Caesarean Deliveries (CD) at a Tertiary Hospital in Northeastern Nigeria: A 5 Year Review.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Itohan OsayandeSchool of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London, SE10 9LS, UK.
Olakunmi OgunyemiLagos State Ministry of Health, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.
Uchenna Gwacham-AnisiobiNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abimbola OlaniranGlobal Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sanni YayaSchool of International Development and Global Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Aduragbemi Banke-ThomasSchool of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, London, SE10 9LS, UK. a.bankethomas@gre.ac.uk.
University of Greenwich · GBLagos State University · NGRoyal Tropical Institute · NLThe George Institute for Global Health · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 80,000 pregnant women died in Nigeria due to pregnancy-related complications in 2020. Evidence shows that if appropriately conducted, caesarean section (CS) reduces the odds of maternal death. In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO), in a statement, proposed an optimal national prevalence of CS and recommended the use of Robson classification for classifying and determining intra-facility CS rates. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise evidence on prevalence, indications, and complications of intra-facility CS in Nigeria.

methodsFour databases (African Journals Online, Directory of Open Access Journals, EBSCOhost, and PubMed) were systematically searched for relevant articles published from 2000 to 2022. Articles were screened following the PRISMA guidelines, and those meeting the study's inclusion criteria were retained for review. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist. Narrative synthesis of CS prevalence, indications, and complications as well as a meta-analysis of CS prevalence using R were conducted.

resultsWe retrieved 45 articles, with most (33 (64.4%)) being assessed as high quality. The overall prevalence of CS in facilities across Nigeria was 17.6%. We identified a higher prevalence of emergency CS (75.9%) compared to elective CS (24.3%). We also identified a significantly higher CS prevalence in facilities in the south (25.5%) compared to the north (10.6%). Furthermore, we observed a 10.7% increase in intra-facility CS prevalence following the implementation of the WHO statement. However, none of the studies adopted the Robson classification of CS to determine intra-facility CS rates. In addition, neither hierarchy of care (tertiary or secondary) nor type of facility (public or private) significantly influenced intra-facility CS prevalence. The commonest indications for a CS were previous scar/CS (3.5-33.5%) and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders (5.5-30.0%), while anaemia (6.4-57.1%) was the most reported complication.

conclusionThere are disparities in the prevalence, indications, and complications of CS in facilities across the geopolitical zones of Nigeria, suggestive of concurrent overuse and underuse. There is a need for comprehensive solutions to optimise CS provision tailor-made for zones in Nigeria. Furthermore, future research needs to adopt current guidelines to improve comparison of CS rates.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansNigeriaPregnancyPrevalenceCaesarean deliveryComplicationEmergency obstetric careIndicationNigeriaPrevalenceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37268951
PMCPMC10237076
OpenAlexW4379141844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.