Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37274177›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Poststroke venous thromboembolism and neutrophil activation: an illustrated review.

Nirav Dhanesha, Junaid Ansari, Nilesh Pandey, Harpreet Kaur, Chiranjiv Virk, Karen Y Stokes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The dilemma of thromboprophylaxis in stroke patients.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immunothrombosis in neurovascular disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nirav DhaneshaDepartment of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Junaid AnsariDepartment of Neurology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Nilesh PandeyDepartment of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Harpreet KaurDepartment of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Chiranjiv VirkDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Karen Y StokesDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, USA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · US

Funding

Mechanisms for Deep Vein Thrombosis following StrokeR01HL158546 · NHLBI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI Nirav Dhanesha · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
Investigating the dysfunction of the cerebral microvasculature in sickle cell diseaseR01HL134959 · NHLBI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI STOKES, KAREN Y · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134959NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with acute ischemic stroke are at a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), estimated to affect approximately 80,000 patients with stroke each year in the United States. The prevalence of symptomatic DVT after acute stroke is approximately 10%. VTE is associated with increased rates of in-hospital death and disability, with higher prevalence of in-hospital complications and increased 1-year mortality in patients with stroke. Current guidelines recommend the use of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, thromboprophylaxis prevents only half of expected VTE events and is associated with high risk of bleeding, suggesting the need for targeted alternative treatments to reduce VTE risk in these patients. Neutrophils are among the first cells in blood to respond after ischemic stroke. Importantly, coordinated interactions among neutrophils, platelets, and endothelial cells contribute to the development of DVT. In case of stroke and other related immune disorders, such as antiphospholipid syndrome, neutrophils potentiate thrombus propagation through the formation of neutrophil-platelet aggregates, secreting inflammatory mediators, complement activation, releasing tissue factor, and producing neutrophil extracellular traps. In this illustrated review article, we present epidemiology and management of poststroke VTE, preclinical and clinical evidence of neutrophil hyperactivation in stroke, and mechanisms for neutrophil-mediated VTE in the context of stroke. Given the hyperactivation of circulating neutrophils in patients with stroke, we propose that a better understanding of molecular mechanisms leading to neutrophil activation may result in the development of novel therapeutics to reduce the risk of VTE in this patient population.

Indexed as

deep vein thrombosisischemic strokeneutrophilsthromboprophylaxisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID37274177
PMCPMC10236222
OpenAlexW4367397498

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.