ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023
Poststroke venous thromboembolism and neutrophil activation: an illustrated review.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution of neutrophil extracellular traps in the pathology of stroke.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- The dilemma of thromboprophylaxis in stroke patients.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Psychoneurological symptom clusters in patients with first stroke and relationship with inflammatory markers: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- CD14 Blockade Does Not Improve Outcomes of Deep Vein Thrombosis Following Inferior Vena Cava Stenosis in Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Immunothrombosis in neurovascular disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with acute ischemic stroke are at a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), estimated to affect approximately 80,000 patients with stroke each year in the United States. The prevalence of symptomatic DVT after acute stroke is approximately 10%. VTE is associated with increased rates of in-hospital death and disability, with higher prevalence of in-hospital complications and increased 1-year mortality in patients with stroke. Current guidelines recommend the use of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, thromboprophylaxis prevents only half of expected VTE events and is associated with high risk of bleeding, suggesting the need for targeted alternative treatments to reduce VTE risk in these patients. Neutrophils are among the first cells in blood to respond after ischemic stroke. Importantly, coordinated interactions among neutrophils, platelets, and endothelial cells contribute to the development of DVT. In case of stroke and other related immune disorders, such as antiphospholipid syndrome, neutrophils potentiate thrombus propagation through the formation of neutrophil-platelet aggregates, secreting inflammatory mediators, complement activation, releasing tissue factor, and producing neutrophil extracellular traps. In this illustrated review article, we present epidemiology and management of poststroke VTE, preclinical and clinical evidence of neutrophil hyperactivation in stroke, and mechanisms for neutrophil-mediated VTE in the context of stroke. Given the hyperactivation of circulating neutrophils in patients with stroke, we propose that a better understanding of molecular mechanisms leading to neutrophil activation may result in the development of novel therapeutics to reduce the risk of VTE in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.