ArticlePLOS global public health2023
Cross-sectional validation of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in rural Uganda.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- What factors predict severity of palliative care symptoms and concerns in COPD in South Africa? A cross-sectional study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Quality of Life and Emotional Problems of COVID-19 Patients after Discharge: A One-Month Longitudinal Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Risk factors identification of COVID-19 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A retrospective study in Punjab-Pakistan.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring quality of life is a key component in the management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The COPD assessment test (CAT), an easy to administer and shorter instrument than the standard Saint George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), could be an alternative tool for measuring the quality of life of COPD patients in rural Uganda. A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and August 2022, consecutively recruiting 113 COPD patients aged > 40 years from the Low-Dose Theophylline for the management of Biomass-associated COPD (LODOT-BCOPD) study. Upon obtaining consent, participants answered an interviewer administered social demographic, CAT and SGRQ questionnaire. Internal consistency for both SGRQ and CAT was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and values > 0.7 were considered acceptable while correlations were determined using Spearman's rank correlation. Limits of Agreement were visualised using Bland Altman and pair plots. Of the 113 participants, 51 (45.1%) were female. The mean age was 64 ± 12 years, 19 (16.8%) had history of smoking while majority (112 (99.1%)) reported use of firewood for cooking. There was a strong correlation of 0.791 (p < 0.001) between the CAT and SGRQ total scores with a high internal consistency of CAT, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.924 (0.901-0.946). The agreement between the absolute CAT scores and the SGRQ scores was good with a mean difference of -0.932 (95% Confidence Interval: -33.49-31.62). In summary, CAT has an acceptable validity and can be used as an alternative to the SGRQ to assess the quality of life of COPD patients in rural Uganda.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.