Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37278831›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Machine learning and deep learning techniques for breast cancer diagnosis and classification: a comprehensive review of medical imaging studies.

Mehran Radak, Haider Yabr Lafta, Hossein Fallahi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehran RadakDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, Razi University, Baq-e-Abrisham, Kermanshah, 6714967346, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Haider Yabr LaftaDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, Razi University, Baq-e-Abrisham, Kermanshah, 6714967346, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Hossein FallahiDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, Razi University, Baq-e-Abrisham, Kermanshah, 6714967346, Islamic Republic of Iran. Fallahi.raziuni@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is a major public health concern, and early diagnosis and classification are critical for effective treatment. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have shown great promise in the classification and diagnosis of breast cancer. PURPOSE: In this review, we examine studies that have used these techniques for breast cancer classification and diagnosis, focusing on five groups of medical images: mammography, ultrasound, MRI, histology, and thermography. We discuss the use of five popular machine learning techniques, including Nearest Neighbor, SVM, Naive Bayesian Network, DT, and ANN, as well as deep learning architectures and convolutional neural networks.

conclusionOur review finds that machine learning and deep learning techniques have achieved high accuracy rates in breast cancer classification and diagnosis across various medical imaging modalities. Furthermore, these techniques have the potential to improve clinical decision-making and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMachine LearningMammographyANNBreast cancerConvolutional neural networkDeep learningDTHistologyMachine learningMammographyMedical imagingMRINaive Bayesian networkNearest neighborSVMThermographyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37278831
PMCPMC11796781

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.