ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2023
Successful editing and maintenance of lactogenic gene expression in primary bovine mammary epithelial cells.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resolving Cattle GWAS Loci: Current Progress, Persistent Challenges and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro investigation of bovine lactation processes is limited by a lack of physiologically representative cell models. This deficiency is most evident through the minimal or absent expression of lactation-specific genes in cultured bovine mammary tissues. Primary bovine mammary epithelial cells (pbMECs) extracted from lactating mammary tissue and grown in culture initially express milk protein transcripts at relatively representative levels. However, expression drops dramatically after only three or four passages, which greatly reduces the utility of primary cells to model and further examine lactogenesis. To investigate the effects of alternate alleles in pbMECs including effects on transcription, we have developed methods to deliver CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing reagents to primary mammary cells, resulting in very high editing efficiencies. We have also found that culturing the cells on an imitation basement membrane composed of Matrigel, results in the restoration of a more representative lactogenic gene expression profile and the cells forming three-dimensional structures in vitro. Here, we present data from four pbMEC lines recovered from pregnant cows and detail the expression profile of five key milk synthesis genes in these MECs grown on Matrigel. Additionally, we describe an optimised method for preferentially selecting CRISPR-Cas9-edited cells conferring a knock-out of DGAT1, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The combination of these techniques facilitates the use of pbMECs as a model to investigate the effects of gene introgressions and genetic variation in lactating mammary tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.