Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279504›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2023

The Evolutionary Constraints on Angiosperm Chloroplast Adaptation.

Elizabeth H J Robbins, Steven Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring the Complete Chloroplast Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Analysis of Plastome Sequences of SevenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Rubisco is evolving for improved catalytic efficiency and COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth H J RobbinsDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3441-5445
Steven KellyDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-5362
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011224/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P003117/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chloroplast (plastid) arose via the endosymbiosis of a photosynthetic cyanobacterium by a nonphotosynthetic eukaryotic cell ∼1.5 billion years ago. Although the plastid underwent rapid evolution by genome reduction, its rate of molecular evolution is low and its genome organization is highly conserved. Here, we investigate the factors that have constrained the rate of molecular evolution of protein-coding genes in the plastid genome. Through phylogenomic analysis of 773 angiosperm plastid genomes, we show that there is substantial variation in the rate of molecular evolution between genes. We demonstrate that the distance of a plastid gene from the likely origin of replication influences the rate at which it has evolved, consistent with time and distance-dependent nucleotide mutation gradients. In addition, we show that the amino acid composition of a gene product constraints its substitution tolerance, limiting its mutation landscape and its corresponding rate of molecular evolution. Finally, we demonstrate that the mRNA abundance of a gene is a key factor in determining its rate of molecular evolution, suggesting an interaction between transcription and DNA repair in the plastid. Collectively, we show that the location, the composition, and the expression of a plastid gene can account for >50% of the variation in its rate of molecular evolution. Thus, these three factors have exerted a substantial limitation on the capacity for adaptive evolution in plastid-encoded genes and ultimately constrained the evolvability of the chloroplast.

Indexed as

Genome, PlastidMagnoliopsidaChloroplastsEvolution, MolecularGenomePhylogenyPlastidsadaptive evolutionchloroplastevolutionary constraintevolvabilityphylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID37279504
PMCPMC10279810
OpenAlexW4379598382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.