Evidence mapPaperPMID 37280683Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Providing office workers with height-adjustable workstation to reduce and interrupt workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand Up for Healthy Aging (SUFHA) cluster randomized controlled trial.

Pedro B Júdice, Hélio Silva, Sabrina C Teno, Patrícia Monteiro, Marlene N Silva, Eliana V Carraça, Inês Santos, Sara Pereira, Filipe Luz, Patrícia C Viegas and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pedro B JúdiceCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal. p5274@ulusofona.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2791-258X
Hélio SilvaCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sabrina C TenoCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Patrícia MonteiroEscola de Psicologia e Ciências da Vida, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marlene N SilvaCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Eliana V CarraçaCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Inês SantosCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sara PereiraCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Filipe LuzHei-Lab - Universidade Lusófona, Campo Grande, Lisbon, Portugal.
Patrícia C ViegasCenter for Other Worlds - Universidade Lusófona, Campo Grande, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jorge OliveiraEscola de Psicologia e Ciências da Vida, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
Isabel F SantosEscola de Psicologia e Ciências da Vida, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.
António L PalmeiraCIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

ILIND - FAZER+ FAZER+/ILIND/CIDEFES/1/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary behavior (SB) has been linked to several negative health outcomes. Therefore, reducing SB or breaking up prolonged periods of SB improves functional fitness, food consumption, job satisfaction, and productivity. Reducing SB can be achieved by introducing a health-enhancing contextual modification promoted by a sit-stand desk in the workplace. The primary goal will be to test the effectiveness of this intervention in reducing and breaking up SB, while improving health outcomes in office-based workers during a 6-month intervention.

methodsA two-arm (1:1), superiority parallel-group cluster RCT will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention in a sample of office-based workers from a university in Portugal. The intervention will consist of a psychoeducation session, motivational prompts, and contextual modification promoted by a sit-stand desk in the workplace for 6 months. The control group will work as usual in their workplace, with no contextual change or prompts during the 6-month intervention. Three assessment points will be conducted in both groups, pre-intervention (baseline), post-intervention, and a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcomes include sedentary and physical activity-related variables, which will be objectively assessed with 24 h monitoring using the ActivPAL for 7 days. The secondary outcomes include (a) biometric indices as body composition, body mass index, waist circumference, and postural inequalities; and (b) psychosocial variables such as overall and work-related fatigue, overall discomfort, life/work satisfaction, quality of life, and eating behavior. Both the primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at each assessment point. DISCUSSION: This study will lean on the use of a sit-stand workstation for 6 months, prompted by an initial psychoeducational session and ongoing motivational prompts. We will aim to contribute to this topic by providing robust data on alternating sitting and standing postures in the workplace.

trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered, and the details are at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JHGPW ; Registered 15 November 2022. OSF Preregistration.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingOccupational HealthEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSitting PositionTime FactorsWorkplaceActivPALContextual modificationMotivational nudgesSedentary behaviorSit-stand deskSitting timeStanding time

Identifiers

PMID37280683
PMCPMC10245479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.