Evidence mapPaperPMID 37280685Full record

SynthesisReproductive health2023

University students' fertility awareness and its influencing factors: a systematic review.

Yue Ren, Yue Xie, Qulian Xu, Miaochen Long, Ying Zheng, Lin Li, Changmin Niu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. F&S reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue RenSchool of Nursing School of Public, Health Yangzhou University, Mid Jiangyang Road 136, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yue XieSchool of Nursing School of Public, Health Yangzhou University, Mid Jiangyang Road 136, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Qulian XuSchool of Nursing School of Public, Health Yangzhou University, Mid Jiangyang Road 136, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Miaochen LongSchool of Nursing School of Public, Health Yangzhou University, Mid Jiangyang Road 136, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Ying ZhengSchool of Nursing School of Public, Health Yangzhou University, Mid Jiangyang Road 136, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Lin LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Yangzhou, China.
Changmin NiuSchool of Nursing School of Public, Health Yangzhou University, Mid Jiangyang Road 136, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. 007524@yzu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82101674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn recent years, a growing number of researchers have begun to study fertility awareness (FA). Evidence suggests that college students in their reproductive years have a common understanding of fertility, risk factors for infertility, and assisted reproductive technologies. Therefore, this systematic review summarizes these studies and explores the factors affecting college students' fertility awareness.

methodsA systematic literature search of databases (PUBMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and EBSCO) was conducted from inception to September 2022. Studies that assessed the levels of fertility awareness and factors influencing college students were considered for the review. The qualities of the included studies were evaluated using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. This systematic review is reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review (PRISMA) guidelines.

resultsTwenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria and were included. The preliminary results showed that participants reported low to moderate FA. Female medical students demonstrated higher levels of fertility awareness. The association between age, years of education, and FA was insufficient.

conclusionThe results of the current study suggest that increased FA interventions are warranted, especially for the male, non-medical student population. Governments and educational institutions should strengthen education programs for young students on reproductive health to help them raise awareness about childbirth, and society should provide family support for young people.

Indexed as

FertilityInfertilityAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsStudentsUniversitiesAge-related fertility declineCollege studentsFertility awarenessInfluencing factorsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37280685
PMCPMC10242772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.