Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284157›Full record

ArticleFree neuropathology2022

Neurodegeneration: 2022 update.

John F Crary

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Free neuropathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John F CraryNeuropathology Brain Bank & Research CoRE, Department of Pathology, Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, Department of Artificial Intelligence & Human Health, Ronald M. Loeb Center for Alzheimer's Disease, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Allen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we review a collection of recent manuscripts and research trends on the neuropathology of neurodegeneration that are considered by the author to be among the potentially most impactful. To the greatest extent possible, we chose to focus on histopathological studies that are most relevant to experimental and diagnostic neuropathology. While there has been an abundance of important recent discoveries and developments in neurodegenerative disease research, there was a deliberate effort here to provide balance to prevent disease categories and experimental approaches from overshadowing the others. The result is a diverse series of outstanding studies, together showing the landscape of progress across neurodegenerative disorders. One is a stereological study examining dystrophic microglia in aging. We highlight the first large genetic study of primary age-related tauopathy, showing convergence and divergence from classical Alzheimer's disease. There were further advances in the neuropathological criteria and staging of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Links suggesting a causal role for

Indexed as

AgingAlzheimer diseaseHuntington’s diseaseMicrogliaNeurodegenerationNeuropathologyTauopathyTDP-43 proteinopathyTraumatic brain injuryα-synucleinopathy

Identifiers

PMID37284157
PMCPMC10209853
OpenAlexW4379600999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.