Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37285313›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

networkGWAS: a network-based approach to discover genetic associations.

Giulia Muzio, Leslie O'Bray, Laetitia Meng-Papaxanthos, Juliane Klatt, Krista Fischer, Karsten Borgwardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The neocortical infrastructure for language involves region-specific patterns of laminar gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Diagnosis- and Prognosis-Related Gene Alterations inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Giulia MuzioMachine Learning and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5999-2030
Leslie O'BrayMachine Learning and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8999-9962
Laetitia Meng-PapaxanthosMachine Learning and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Juliane KlattMachine Learning and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4096-566X
Krista FischerInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-3521-0599
Karsten BorgwardtMachine Learning and Computational Biology Lab, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-2393
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWhile the search for associations between genetic markers and complex traits has led to the discovery of tens of thousands of trait-related genetic variants, the vast majority of these only explain a small fraction of the observed phenotypic variation. One possible strategy to overcome this while leveraging biological prior is to aggregate the effects of several genetic markers and to test entire genes, pathways or (sub)networks of genes for association to a phenotype. The latter, network-based genome-wide association studies, in particular suffer from a vast search space and an inherent multiple testing problem. As a consequence, current approaches are either based on greedy feature selection, thereby risking that they miss relevant associations, or neglect doing a multiple testing correction, which can lead to an abundance of false positive findings.

resultsTo address the shortcomings of current approaches of network-based genome-wide association studies, we propose networkGWAS, a computationally efficient and statistically sound approach to network-based genome-wide association studies using mixed models and neighborhood aggregation. It allows for population structure correction and for well-calibrated P-values, which are obtained through circular and degree-preserving network permutations. networkGWAS successfully detects known associations on diverse synthetic phenotypes, as well as known and novel genes in phenotypes from Saccharomycescerevisiae and Homo sapiens. It thereby enables the systematic combination of gene-based genome-wide association studies with biological network information. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/networkGWAS.git.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPopulation GroupsGenetic MarkersHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID37285313
PMCPMC10281858
OpenAlexW4379615353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.