ReviewCytogenetic and genome research2023
Biomarkers for Biodosimetry and Their Role in Predicting Radiation Injury.
Review in Cytogenetic and genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiotherapy-Induced Side Effects: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatments.MedComm · 2026Review
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for the Preterminal Stage Using Rhesus Macaques Exposed to Acute Total-Body Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Radiation emergency medical countermeasures: Current formulary, identified gaps, and future approaches.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Multicentered Biospecimen Analyses after 4 Gy Sublethal Total Body Irradiation in Rhesus Macaques.Radiation research · 2025Article
- Partial-body Models of Radiation Exposure.Radiation research · 2025Review
- Proteomic analysis of plasma at the preterminal stage of rhesus nonhuman primates exposed to a lethal total-body dose of gamma-radiation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation-related normal tissue injury sustained during cancer radiotherapy or in a radiological or mass casualty nuclear incident is a major health concern. Reducing the risk and mitigating consequences of radiation injury could have a broad impact on cancer patients and citizens. Efforts to discover biomarkers that can determine radiation dose, predict tissue damage, and aid medical triage are underway. Exposure to ionizing radiation causes changes in gene, protein, and metabolite expression that needs to be understood to provide a holistic picture for treating acute and chronic radiation-induced toxicities. We present evidence that both RNA (mRNA, microRNA, long noncoding RNA) and metabolomic assays may provide useful biomarkers of radiation injury. RNA markers may provide information on early pathway alterations after radiation injury that can predict damage and implicate downstream targets for mitigation. In contrast, metabolomics is impacted by changes in epigenetics, genetics, and proteomics and can be considered a downstream marker that incorporates all these changes to provide an assessment of what is currently happening within an organ. We highlight research from the past 10 years to understand how biomarkers may be used to improve personalized medicine in cancer therapy and medical decision-making in mass casualty scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.