ArticleHuman genomics2023
Economic evaluation of pharmacogenomic-guided antiplatelet treatment in Spanish patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study.
Article in Human genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-emptiveFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Advancing Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry: A Descriptive Pilot Study Integrating Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacokinetics in Long-Acting Antipsychotic Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- STRIPE partners in precision medicine: international perspective.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Review
- Clinical Application of Pharmacogenomics in Stroke Management: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Journal of stroke · 2026Review
- The critical need to implement pharmacogenomics in public health services: Mexico in the global picture.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multinational cost-utility analysis of panel-based pharmacogenetics-guided treatment of patients enrolled in the U-PGx PREPARE study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing in Italy: a review of evidence and multidisciplinary consensus on key priorities for implementation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenomics in the UK National Health Service: Progress towards implementation.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
- Clinical impact of pharmacogenetic risk variants in a large chinese cohort.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Implementing health economics for pharmacogenomics research translation in Africa.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Using pharmacogenomics to personalise drug therapy: which drugs, when and how.Australian prescriber · 2025Review
- Systematic analysis of the pharmacogenomics landscape towards clinical implementation of precision therapeutics in Greece.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Implementation of pre-emptive testing of a pharmacogenomic panel in clinical practice: Where do we stand?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
- Population-specific genetic differences of acute coronary syndrome in Han and Uyghur Chinese.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Understanding general practitioner and pharmacist preferences for pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: a discrete choice experiment.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Article
- Novel Genetic Variants Explaining Severe Adverse Drug Events after Clinical Implementation ofPharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Cost-utility analysis of pharmacogenomics-guided tacrolimus treatment in Austrian kidney transplant recipients participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Article
- The diversity and clinical implications of genetic variants influencing clopidogrel bioactivation and response in the Emirati population.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Metabolomics-based treatment for chronic diseases: results from a multidisciplinary clinical study.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular diseases and especially Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) constitute a major health issue impacting millions of patients worldwide. Being a leading cause of death and hospital admissions in many European countries including Spain, it accounts for enormous amounts of healthcare expenditures for its management. Clopidogrel is one of the oldest antiplatelet medications used as standard of care in ACS.
methodsIn this study, we performed an economic evaluation study to estimate whether a genome-guided clopidogrel treatment is cost-effective compared to conventional one in a large cohort of 243 individuals of Spanish origin suffering from ACS and treated with clopidogrel. Data were derived from the U-PGx PREPARE clinical trial. Effectiveness was measured as survival of individuals while study data on safety and efficacy, as well as on resource utilization associated with each adverse drug reaction were used to measure costs to treat these adverse drug reactions. A generalized linear regression model was used to estimate cost differences for both study groups.
resultsBased on our findings, PGx-guided treatment group is cost-effective. PGx-guided treatment demonstrated to have 50% less hospital admissions, reduced emergency visits and almost 13% less ADRs compared to the non-PGx approach with mean QALY 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04-1.10) versus 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03-1.09) for the control group, while life years for both groups were 1.24 (95% CI, 1.20-1.26) and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.19-1.26), respectively. The mean total cost of PGx-guided treatment was 50% less expensive than conventional therapy with clopidogrel [€883 (95% UI, €316-€1582), compared to €1,755 (95% UI, €765-€2949)].
conclusionThese findings suggest that PGx-guided clopidogrel treatment represents a cost-effective option for patients suffering from ACS in the Spanish healthcare setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.