Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287739›Full record

ReviewPostepy psychiatrii neurologii2023

Effectiveness of various diet patterns among patients with multiple sclerosis.

Magdalena Zielińska, Izabela Michońska

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena ZielińskaInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-3206
Izabela MichońskaInstitute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-8122
Rzeszów University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The main aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of the dietary patterns studied in the context of multiple sclerosis (MS), including anti-inflammatory, Mediterranean diet (MD), Mediterranean-DASH intervention for neurodegenerative delay (MIND), intermittent fasting (IF), gluten-free and ketogenic diets. In addition, another aim was to verify or otherwise the efficacy of other alternative dietary models, which include the Paleo diet, the Wahls diet, the McDougall diet and the Swank diet. Whether and to what extent the use of different dietary regimens can affect the course and reduction of individual MS symptoms was also examined. The advantages and disadvantages of selected diets and dietary patterns in the context of MS are discussed. Views: Autoimmune diseases are estimated to affect more than 3% of the world's people, the majority of whom are of working age. Therefore, delaying the first manifestation of the disease, reducing the number of relapses and alleviating symptoms are particularly welcome developments. In addition to finding effective pharmacotherapy, high hopes for patients lie in nutritional prevention and diet therapy. For years the medical literature has discussed supporting the treatment of diseases caused by an impairment of the body's immune system with the help of nutrition. Conclusions: An appropriate and balanced diet can be extremely helpful in improving the condition and well-being of patients with MS, and effectively support drug therapy.

Indexed as

dietary patternsMSmultiple sclerosisnutrition

Identifiers

PMID37287739
PMCPMC10243296
OpenAlexW4376853171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.