ArticleStatistical communications in infectious diseases2020
Pre-selected class-level testing of longitudinal biomarkers reduces required multiple testing corrections to yield novel insights in longitudinal small sample human studies.
Article in Statistical communications in infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Exploratory studies that aim to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies in human cohorts often involve the collection of hundreds of variables measured over time on a small sample of individuals. Stringent error control for testing hypotheses in this setting renders it difficult to identify statistically signification associations. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how leveraging prior information about the biological relationships among variables can increase power for novel discovery. Methods: We apply the class level association score statistic for longitudinal data (CLASS-LD) as an analysis strategy that complements single variable tests. An example is presented that aims to evaluate the relationships among 14 T-cell and monocyte activation variables measured with CD4 T-cell count over three time points after antiretroviral therapy (n=62). Results: CLASS-LD using three classes with emphasis on T-cell activation with either classical vs. intermediate/inflammatory monocyte subsets detected associations in two of three classes, while single variable testing detected only one out of the 14 variables considered. Conclusions: Application of a class-level testing strategy provides an alternative to single immune variables by defining hypotheses based on a collection of variables that share a known underlying biological relationship. Broader use of class-level analysis is expected to increase the available information that can be derived from limited sample clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.