Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37288475›Full record

ArticleAging cell2023

Modelling the dynamics of senescence spread.

Lucy Martin, Linus Schumacher, Tamir Chandra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. FOLR2Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025
    Review
  6. The Hallmarks of Precancer.Cancer discovery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy MartinInstitute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Linus SchumacherCentre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tamir ChandraInstitute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1949-9422

Funding

Cancer Research UK 27589Cancer Research UK C157/A27589Medical Research Council MC_UU_00009/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a cell surveillance mechanism that arrests the cell cycle in damaged cells. The senescent phenotype can spread from cell to cell through paracrine and juxtacrine signalling, but the dynamics of this process are not well understood. Although senescent cells are important in ageing, wound healing and cancer, it is unclear how the spread of senescence is contained in senescent lesions. In the absence of the immune system, senescence could theoretically spread infinitely from one cell to another, but this contradicts experimental evidence. To investigate this issue, we developed both a minimal mathematical model and a stochastic simulation of senescence spread. Our results suggest that differences in the number of signalling molecules secreted between subtypes of senescent cells can limit the spread of senescence. We found that dynamic, time-dependent paracrine signalling prevents the uncontrolled spread of senescence, and we demonstrate how model parameters can be determined using Bayesian inference in a proposed experiment.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceNeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansPhenotypecell signallingmathematical modelSASPsenescence

Identifiers

PMID37288475
PMCPMC10410058

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.