Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37290122›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2023

Development and validation of an international preoperative risk assessment model for postoperative delirium.

Benjamin T Dodsworth, Kelly Reeve, Lisa Falco, Tom Hueting, Behnam Sadeghirad, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Nicolai Goettel, Nayeli Schmutz Gelsomino

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06519890 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Stanford-PIPRA Study: The Accuracy of the Pre-Interventional Preventive Risk Assessment (PIPRA) Tool for the Prediction of ICU-Delirium in a Mixed Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit Population

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled199ConditionsDelirium, Cognitive Impairment, Delirium, Postoperative
NCT06567574 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Stanford Study of the Validation of the Pre-Interventional Preventive Risk Assessment (PIPRA) Tool In The At-Risk Orthopedic Surgery Population

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled250ConditionsDelirium, Postoperative Delirium, Cognitive Impairment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and validation of theAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cognitive Decline in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin T DodsworthPIPRA AG, Zurich 8005, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7908-7855
Kelly ReeveInstitute of Data Analysis and Process Design, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur 8400, Switzerland.
Lisa FalcoZühlke Engineering AG, Zürcherstrasse 39J, Schlieren 8952, Switzerland.
Tom HuetingEvidencio, Irenesingel 19, Haaksbergen 7481 GJ, Netherlands.
Behnam SadeghiradDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Lawrence MbuagbawDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Nicolai GoettelDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville FL 32610, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0191-9775
Nayeli Schmutz GelsominoPIPRA AG, Zurich 8005, Switzerland.

Funding

EIT Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent complication in older adults, characterised by disturbances in attention, awareness and cognition, and associated with prolonged hospitalisation, poor functional recovery, cognitive decline, long-term dementia and increased mortality. Early identification of patients at risk of POD can considerably aid prevention.

methodsWe have developed a preoperative POD risk prediction algorithm using data from eight studies identified during a systematic review and providing individual-level data. Ten-fold cross-validation was used for predictor selection and internal validation of the final penalised logistic regression model. The external validation used data from university hospitals in Switzerland and Germany.

resultsDevelopment included 2,250 surgical (excluding cardiac and intracranial) patients 60 years of age or older, 444 of whom developed POD. The final model included age, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, history of delirium, cognitive impairment, medications, optional C-reactive protein (CRP), surgical risk and whether the operation is a laparotomy/thoracotomy. At internal validation, the algorithm had an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82) with CRP and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82) without CRP. The external validation consisted of 359 patients, 87 of whom developed POD. The external validation yielded an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.80).

conclusionsThe algorithm is named PIPRA (Pre-Interventional Preventive Risk Assessment), has European conformity (ce) certification, is available at http://pipra.ch/ and is accepted for clinical use. It can be used to optimise patient care and prioritise interventions for vulnerable patients and presents an effective way to implement POD prevention strategies in clinical practice.

Indexed as

DeliriumEmergence DeliriumAgedC-Reactive ProteinHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsC-Reactive Proteinalgorithmclinical practiceolder peoplepostoperative deliriumrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID37290122
PMCPMC10250022

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.