Evidence mapPaperPMID 37293246Full record

ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2023

Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels among pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ping Teresa Yeh, Caitlin Elizabeth Kennedy, Dong Keun Rhee, Chloe Zera, Özge Tunçalp, Briana Lucido, Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de Leon, Manjulaa Narasimhan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ping Teresa YehDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Caitlin Elizabeth KennedyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Dong Keun RheeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Chloe ZeraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Özge TunçalpDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction-HRP, Geneva, Switzerland.
Briana LucidoDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction-HRP, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de LeonLatin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health PAHO/WHO, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Manjulaa NarasimhanDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction-HRP, Geneva, Switzerland.
Johns Hopkins University · USWorld Health Organization · CHHarvard University · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends treatment and management of gestational diabetes (GD) through lifestyle changes, including diet and exercise, and self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) to inform timely treatment decisions. To expand the evidence base of WHO's guideline on self-care interventions, we conducted a systematic review of SMBG among pregnant individuals with GD. Setting: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, and EMBASE for publications through November 2020 comparing SMBG with clinic-based monitoring during antenatal care (ANC) globally. Primary and secondary outcome measures: We extracted data using standardized forms and summarized maternal and newborn findings using random effects meta-analysis in GRADE evidence tables. We also reviewed studies on values, preferences, and costs of SMBG. Results: We identified 6 studies examining SMBG compared to routine ANC care, 5 studies on values and preferences, and 1 study on costs. Nearly all were conducted in Europe and North America. Moderate-certainty evidence from 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that SMBG as part of a package of interventions for GD treatment was associated with lower rates of preeclampsia, lower mean birthweight, fewer infants born large for gestational age, fewer infants with macrosomia, and lower rates of shoulder dystocia. There was no difference between groups in self-efficacy, preterm birth, C-section, mental health, stillbirth, or respiratory distress. No studies measured placenta previa, long-term complications, device-related issues, or social harms. Most end-users supported SMBG, motivated by health benefits, convenience, ease of use, and increased confidence. Health workers acknowledged SMBG's convenience but were wary of technical problems. One study found SMBG by pregnant individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with decreased costs for hospital admission and length of stay. Conclusion: SMBG during pregnancy is feasible and acceptable, and when combined in a package of GD interventions, is generally associated with improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, research from resource-limited settings is needed. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021233862.

Indexed as

blood glucosediabetespre-eclampsiapregnancyself-careself-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37293246
PMCPMC10244567
OpenAlexW4378072561

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.