Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294649›Full record

ReviewIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics

Artificial Intelligence Models for Cell Type and Subtype Identification Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data in Vision Science.

Yeganeh Madadi, Aboozar Monavarfeshani, Hao Chen, W Daniel Stamer, Robert W Williams, Siamak Yousefi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yeganeh Madadi
Aboozar Monavarfeshani
Hao Chen
W Daniel Stamer
Robert W Williams
Siamak Yousefi

Funding

TIM Project NIDA P30 CenterP30DA044223 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SABA, LAURA MAREN · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
Predicting the risk of glaucoma from structural, functional, and genetic factors using artificial intelligenceR01EY033005 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI YOUSEFI, SIAMAK · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Improved Glaucoma Monitoring Using Artificial-Intelligence Enabled DashboardR21EY031725 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI YOUSEFI, SIAMAK · 2020 to 2022
$545k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033005NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031725NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA044223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides a high throughput, quantitative and unbiased framework for scientists in many research fields to identify and characterize cell types within heterogeneous cell populations from various tissues. However, scRNA-seq based identification of discrete cell-types is still labor intensive and depends on prior molecular knowledge. Artificial intelligence has provided faster, more accurate, and user-friendly approaches for cell-type identification. In this review, we discuss recent advances in cell-type identification methods using artificial intelligence techniques based on single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing data in vision science. The main purpose of this review paper is to assist vision scientists not only to select suitable datasets for their problems, but also to be aware of the appropriate computational tools to perform their analysis. Developing novel methods for scRNA-seq data analysis remains to be addressed in future studies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGene Expression ProfilingCluster AnalysisRNASequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisRNA

Identifiers

PMID37294649
PMCPMC10631573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.