Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37294732›Full record

ArticleGenetics2023

How flower development genes were identified using forward genetic screens in Arabidopsis thaliana.

David R Smyth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Suppression ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David R SmythSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the later part of the 1980s, the time was ripe for identifying genes controlling flower development. In that pregenomic era, the easiest way to do this was to induce random mutations in seeds by chemical mutagens (or irradiation) and to screen thousands of plants for those with phenotypes specifically defective in floral morphogenesis. Here, we discuss the results of premolecular screens for flower development mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana, carried out at Caltech and Monash University, emphasizing the usefulness of saturation mutagenesis, multiple alleles to identify full loss-of-function, conclusions based on multiple mutant analyses, and from screens for enhancer and suppressor modifiers of original mutant phenotypes. One outcome was a series of mutants that led to the ABC floral organ identity model (AP1, AP2, AP3, PI, and AG). In addition, genes controlling flower meristem identity (AP1, CAL, and LFY), floral meristem size (CLV1 and CLV3), development of individual floral organ types (CRC, SPT, and PTL), and inflorescence meristem properties (TFL1, PIN1, and PID) were defined. These occurrences formed targets for cloning that eventually helped lead to an understanding of transcriptional control of the identity of floral organs and flower meristems, signaling within meristems, and the role of auxin in initiating floral organogenesis. These findings in Arabidopsis are now being applied to investigate how orthologous and paralogous genes act in other flowering plants, allowing us to wander in the fertile fields of evo-devo.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantMeristemMutagenesisMutationArabidopsis ProteinsABC modelArabidopsisflower developmentflower meristem identityhomeotic mutantsinflorescence developmentmutant screen

Identifiers

PMID37294732
PMCPMC10411571
OpenAlexW4379984153

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.