Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37296196›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2023

Failure of cartilage regeneration: emerging hypotheses and related therapeutic strategies.

Sathish Muthu, Jasmijn V Korpershoek, Emanuel J Novais, Gwenllian F Tawy, Anthony P Hollander, Ivan Martin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Liquid-Responsive Shape-Memory Nanofiber-Reinforced Scaffolds for Cartilage Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Piezo-Mimetic Ionic Hydrogel Harnessing Joint Motion for Cartilage Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sathish MuthuOrthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7143-4354
Jasmijn V KorpershoekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Emanuel J NovaisUnidade Local de Saúde do Litoral Alentejano, Orthopedic Department, Santiago do Cacém, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6988-4380
Gwenllian F TawyDivision of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anthony P HollanderInstitute of Lifecourse and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-3747
Ivan MartinDepartment of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Ivan.Martin@usb.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-0432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disabling condition that affects billions of people worldwide and places a considerable burden on patients and on society owing to its prevalence and economic cost. As cartilage injuries are generally associated with the progressive onset of OA, robustly effective approaches for cartilage regeneration are necessary. Despite extensive research, technical development and clinical experimentation, no current surgery-based, material-based, cell-based or drug-based treatment can reliably restore the structure and function of hyaline cartilage. This paucity of effective treatment is partly caused by a lack of fundamental understanding of why articular cartilage fails to spontaneously regenerate. Thus, research studies that investigate the mechanisms behind the cartilage regeneration processes and the failure of these processes are critical to instruct decisions about patient treatment or to support the development of next-generation therapies for cartilage repair and OA prevention. This Review provides a synoptic and structured analysis of the current hypotheses about failure in cartilage regeneration, and the accompanying therapeutic strategies to overcome these hurdles, including some current or potential approaches to OA therapy.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularOsteoarthritisChondrocytesHumansRegeneration

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.