ArticleBMC medical genomics2023
Detection of germline variants with pathogenic potential in 48 patients with familial colorectal cancer by using whole exome sequencing.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tooth agenesis as a potential clinical indicator of colorectal cancer susceptibility: a systematic review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Genotype-phenotype correlations inOncology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Exome Sequencing Identifies Variants in MLH1 and ERBB2 as Potential Cancer-Predisposing Factors in Familial Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic landscape of Chinese colorectal cancer: insights into germline and somatic mutations.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Familial colorectal cancer: search for novel predisposition genes.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Germline variants in patients from the Iranian hereditary colorectal cancer registry.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Germline DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations in Patients with Metachronous Breast and Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHereditary genetic mutations causing predisposition to colorectal cancer are accountable for approximately 30% of all colorectal cancer cases. However, only a small fraction of these are high penetrant mutations occurring in DNA mismatch repair genes, causing one of several types of familial colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes. Most of the mutations are low-penetrant variants, contributing to an increased risk of familial colorectal cancer, and they are often found in additional genes and pathways not previously associated with CRC. The aim of this study was to identify such variants, both high-penetrant and low-penetrant ones.
methodsWe performed whole exome sequencing on constitutional DNA extracted from blood of 48 patients suspected of familial colorectal cancer and used multiple in silico prediction tools and available literature-based evidence to detect and investigate genetic variants.
resultsWe identified several causative and some potentially causative germline variants in genes known for their association with colorectal cancer. In addition, we identified several variants in genes not typically included in relevant gene panels for colorectal cancer, including CFTR, PABPC1 and TYRO3, which may be associated with an increased risk for cancer.
conclusionsIdentification of variants in additional genes that potentially can be associated with familial colorectal cancer indicates a larger genetic spectrum of this disease, not limited only to mismatch repair genes. Usage of multiple in silico tools based on different methods and combined through a consensus approach increases the sensitivity of predictions and narrows down a large list of variants to the ones that are most likely to be significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.