Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37297804›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Laboratory Data and IBDQ-Effective Predictors for the Non-Invasive Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Endoscopic Activity in Ulcerative Colitis.

Otilia Gavrilescu, Iolanda Valentina Popa, Mihaela Dranga, Ruxandra Mihai, Cristina Cijevschi Prelipcean, Cătălina Mihai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Otilia GavrilescuMedicale I Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Iolanda Valentina PopaMedicale II Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-8839
Mihaela DrangaMedicale I Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Ruxandra MihaiMedicale II Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Cristina Cijevschi Prelipcean"Saint Spiridon" County Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania.
Cătălina MihaiMedicale I Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9375-9224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A suitable, non-invasive biomarker for assessing endoscopic disease activity (EDA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) has yet to be identified. Our study aimed to develop a cost-effective and non-invasive machine learning (ML) method that utilizes the cost-free Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score and low-cost biological predictors to estimate EDA. Four random forest (RF) and four multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifiers were proposed. The results show that the inclusion of IBDQ in the list of predictors that were fed to the models improved accuracy and the AUC for both the RF and the MLP algorithms. Moreover, the RF technique performed noticeably better than the MLP method on unseen data (the independent patient cohort). This is the first study to propose the use of IBDQ as a predictor in an ML model to estimate UC EDA. The deployment of this ML model can furnish doctors and patients with valuable insights into EDA, a highly beneficial resource for individuals with UC who need long-term treatment.

Indexed as

disease activitymachine learningnon-invasive biomarkersquality of lifeulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID37297804
PMCPMC10253703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.