ArticleMolecular systems biology2023
Updated benchmarking of variant effect predictors using deep mutational scanning.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Variant effect predictors: a systematic review and practical guide.Human genetics · 2024Pooled it
- From conservation scores to language models: a feature engineering perspective on machine learning for genetic variant interpretation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Why variant effect predictors and multiplexed assays agree and disagree.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Scaled Multidimensional Assays of Variant Effect Identify Sequence-Function Relationships in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Circulation · 2026Article
- Overestimating zero-shot fitness prediction: Broad benchmarks mask local failures and practical limitations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Disease-associated genetic variants can cause missense effects in tissue-specific protein isoforms.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Machine learning framework for cost effective deep mutational scanning through targeted substitution profiling.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Functional genomic map of local adaptation in sorghum to guide allele mining.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking genetic birth prevalence estimates against newborn screening data.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Deep mutational scan of the pore of the cold-sensing TRPM8 channel.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CountESS: a flexible, graphical pipeline tool for deep mutational scanning analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Proteome-wide prediction of the functional impact of missense variants with ProteoCast.Nature communications · 2026Article
- RNA Sequencing Resolves Cryptic Pathogenic Variants in Mitochondrial Disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Supervised learning of protein variant effects across large-scale mutagenesis datasets.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Compressing the collective knowledge of ESM into a single protein language model.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Intrinsic dataset features drive mutational effect prediction by protein language models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A survey of downstream applications of evolutionary scale modeling protein language models.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Creating an atlas of variant effects to resolve variants of uncertain significance and guide cardiovascular medicine.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- A scalable approach to resolving variants of uncertain significance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From single-sequences to evolutionary trajectories: protein language models capture the evolutionary potential of SARS-CoV-2.Nature communications · 2026Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assessment of variant effect predictor (VEP) performance is fraught with biases introduced by benchmarking against clinical observations. In this study, building on our previous work, we use independently generated measurements of protein function from deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments for 26 human proteins to benchmark 55 different VEPs, while introducing minimal data circularity. Many top-performing VEPs are unsupervised methods including EVE, DeepSequence and ESM-1v, a protein language model that ranked first overall. However, the strong performance of recent supervised VEPs, in particular VARITY, shows that developers are taking data circularity and bias issues seriously. We also assess the performance of DMS and unsupervised VEPs for discriminating between known pathogenic and putatively benign missense variants. Our findings are mixed, demonstrating that some DMS datasets perform exceptionally at variant classification, while others are poor. Notably, we observe a striking correlation between VEP agreement with DMS data and performance in identifying clinically relevant variants, strongly supporting the validity of our rankings and the utility of DMS for independent benchmarking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.