ArticleHepatology international2024
Diagnostic yield and novel candidate genes by next generation sequencing in 166 children with intrahepatic cholestasis.
Article in Hepatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liver disease reveals KIF12 as a regulator of mitochondria, lysosome and cilia localisation in human cholangiocytes.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the Pump: The Evolving Molecular Landscape of Intrahepatic Cholestasis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multiple aseptic abscesses and pulmonary involvement in a child with Behcet's disease phenotype: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Mild BRIC-like cholestasis despite a grossFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Case report: ZFYVE19 gene mutation is associated with familial cholestasis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsCholestatic liver disease is a leading referral to pediatric liver transplant centers. Inherited disorders are the second most frequent cause of cholestasis in the first month of life.
methodsWe retrospectively characterized the genotype and phenotype of 166 participants with intrahepatic cholestasis, and re-analyzed phenotype and whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from patients with previously undetermined genetic etiology for newly published genes and novel candidates. Functional validations of selected variants were conducted in cultured cells.
resultsOverall, we identified disease-causing variants in 31% (52/166) of our study participants. Of the 52 individuals, 18 (35%) had metabolic liver diseases, 9 (17%) had syndromic cholestasis, 9 (17%) had progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, 3 (6%) had bile acid synthesis defects, 3(6%) had infantile liver failure and 10 (19%) had a phenocopy of intrahepatic cholestasis. By reverse phenotyping, we identified a de novo variant c.1883G > A in FAM111B of a case with high glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) cholestasis. By re-analyzing WES data, two patients were newly solved, who had compound heterozygous variants in recently published genes KIF12 and USP53, respectively. Our additional search for novel candidates in unsolved WES families revealed four potential novel candidate genes (NCOA6, CCDC88B, USP24 and ATP11C), among which the patients with variants in NCOA6 and ATP11C recapitulate the cholestasis phenotype in mice models.
conclusionsIn a single-center pediatric cohort, we identified monogenic variants in 22 known human intrahepatic cholestasis or phenocopy genes, explaining up to 31% of the intrahepatic cholestasis patients. Our findings suggest that re-evaluating existing WES data from well-phenotyped patients on a regular basis can increase the diagnostic yield for cholestatic liver disease in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.