Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328159›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Variance component estimation and genome-wide association of predicted methane production in crossbred beef steers.

Andrew D Lakamp, Cashley M Ahlberg, Kristi Allwardt, Ashely Broocks, Kelsey Bruno, Levi Mcphillips, Alexandra Taylor, Clint R Krehbiel, Michelle S Calvo-Lorenzo, Chris Richards and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D LakampDepartment of Animals Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Cashley M AhlbergDepartment of Animals Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Kristi AllwardtDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Ashely BroocksDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Kelsey BrunoDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Levi McphillipsDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Alexandra TaylorDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Clint R KrehbielDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Michelle S Calvo-LorenzoDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Chris RichardsDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9615-1289
Sara E PlaceDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Udaya DesilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Larry A KuehnUSDA, ARS, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7573-5365
Robert L WeaberDepartment of Animals Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-4214
Jennifer M BormannDepartment of Animals Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Megan M RolfDepartment of Animals Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4774-2218
Oklahoma State University · USKansas State University · USRoman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteric methane is a potent greenhouse gas and represents an escape of energy from the ruminant digestive system. Additive genetic variation in methane production suggests that genetic selection offers an opportunity to diminish enteric methane emissions. Logistic and monetary difficulties in directly measuring methane emissions can make genetic evaluation on an indicator trait such as predicted methane production a more appealing option, and inclusion of genotyping data can result in greater genetic progress. Three predicted methane production traits were calculated for 830 crossbred steers fed in seven groups. The methane prediction equations used included mathematical models from Ellis et al. (2007), Mills et al. (2003), and IPCC (2019). Pearson correlations between the traits were all greater than 0.99, indicating that each prediction equation behaved similarly. Further, the Spearman correlations between the estimated breeding values for each trait were also 0.99, which suggests any of the predicted methane models could be used without substantially changing the ranking of the selection candidates. The heritabilities of Ellis, Mills, and IPCC predicted methane production were 0.60, 0.62, and 0.59, respectively. A genome-wide association study identified one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) that reached the threshold for significance for all of the traits on chromosome 7 related to oxidoreductase activity. Additionally, the SNP slightly below the significance threshold indicate genes related to collagen, intracellular microtubules, and DNA transcription may play a role in predicted methane production or its component traits.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsCattleDietMethanePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideMethanebeef cattlegenetic selectionmethane production

Identifiers

PMID37328159
PMCPMC10284037
OpenAlexW4380873648

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.