Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37328813›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2023

Expectations on implementation of a health promotion practice using individually targeted lifestyle interventions in primary health care: a qualitative study.

Emma Nilsing Strid, Lars Wallin, Ylva Nilsagård

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04799860 (Act in Time- Implementation of Health Promotive Work-way in Primary Care Setting - Evaluation of Effect- and Implementation Process), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04799860 nacompletednot on this map

Act in Time- Implementation of Health Promotive Work-way in Primary Care Setting - Evaluation of Effect- and Implementation Process (AcTi)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion Örebro CountyRan2021 to 2024Enrolled12,000ConditionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeArmshealth promotive work-way
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Championing generalism in educational assessment: the MLA experience.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma Nilsing StridUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. emma.nilsing-strid@oru.se.
Lars WallinDepartment of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Ylva NilsagårdUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is moderate to strong evidence of the effectiveness of health-promotion interventions, but implementation in routine primary health care (PHC) has been slow. In the Act in Time project implementation support is provided for a health promotion practice using individually targeted lifestyle interventions in a PHC setting. Identifying health care professionals' (HCPs') perceptions of barriers and facilitators helps adapt implementation activities and achieve a more successful implementation. This study aimed, at a pre-implementation stage, to describe the expectations of managers, appointed internal facilitators (IFs) and HCPs on implementing a healthy lifestyle-promoting practice in PHC.

methodsIn this qualitative study five focus group discussions with 27 HCPs and 16 individual interviews with managers and appointed IFs were conducted at five PHC centres in central Sweden. The PHC centres are participating in the Act in Time project, evaluating the process and outcomes of a multifaceted implementation strategy for a healthy lifestyle-promoting practice. A deductive qualitative content analysis based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was followed using inductive analysis.

resultsTwelve constructs from four of five CFIR domains were derived: Innovation characteristics, Outer setting, Inner setting, and Characteristics of individuals. These domains are related to the expectations of HCPs to implement a healthy lifestyle-promoting practice, which includes facilitating factors and barriers. The inductive analysis showed that the HCPs perceived a need for a health-promotion approach to PHC. It serves the needs of the patients and the expectations of the HCPs, but lifestyle interventions must be co-produced with the patient. The HCPs expected that changing routine practice into a healthy lifestyle-promoting practice would be challenging, requiring sustainability, improved structures, cooperation in inter-professional teams, and a common purpose. A collective understanding of the purpose of changing practice was vital to successful implementation.

conclusionsThe HCPs valued implementing a healthy lifestyle-promoting practice in a PHC setting. However, changing routine methods was challenging, implying that the implementation strategy should address obstacles and facilitating factors identified by the HCPs.

trial registrationThis study is part of the Act in Time project, registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT04799860 . Registered 03 March 2021.

Indexed as

MotivationPrimary Health CareHealth PromotionHumansLife StyleQualitative ResearchChange ManagementClinical Practice GuidelinesHealth PersonnelHealthy LifestyleImplementation SciencePrimary Health CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID37328813
PMCPMC10273504

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.