Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37329173›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

The prognostic and predictive roles of plasma C-reactive protein and PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer.

Saara Kuusisalo, Antti Tikkanen, Elisa Lappi-Blanco, Timo Väisänen, Aija Knuuttila, Satu Tiainen, Jarkko Ahvonen, Sanna Iivanainen, Jussi P Koivunen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metastatic NSCLC patients in the real world in Finland.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Saara KuusisaloDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Antti TikkanenDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Elisa Lappi-BlancoDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital and Department of Pathology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Timo VäisänenDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital and Department of Pathology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Aija KnuuttilaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Heart and Lung Center and Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Satu TiainenCancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Jarkko AhvonenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4335-5242
Sanna IivanainenDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-1134
Jussi P KoivunenDepartment of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Oulu University Hospital · FIKuopio University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-PD-(L)1 agents have revolutionized the treatment paradigms of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while predictive biomarkers are limited. It has been previously shown that systemic inflammation, indicated by elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level, is associated with a poor prognosis in anti-PD-(L)1 treated. The aim of the study was to analyze the prognostic and predictive value of CRP in addition to traditional prognostic and predictive markers and tumor PD-L1 score.

methodsWe identified all NSCLC patients (n = 329) who had undergone PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) analysis at Oulu University Hospital 2015-22. CRP levels, treatment history, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy details, and survival were collected. The patients were categorized based on CRP levels (≤10 vs. >10) and PD-L1 TPS scores (<50 vs. ≥50).

resultsIn the whole cohort (n = 329), CRP level of ≤10 mg/L was associated with improved survival in univariate (HR 0.30, Cl 95% 0.22-0.41) and multivariate analyzes (HR 0.44, CI 95% 0.28-0.68). With ICI treated (n = 70), both CRP of ≤10 and PD-L1 TPS of ≥50 were associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) in univariate (HR 0.51, CI 95% 0.27-0.96; HR 0.54, CI 95% 0.28-1.02) and multivariate (HR 0.48, CI 95% 0.26-0.90; HR 0.50, CI 95% 0.26-0.95) analyzes. The combination (PD-L1 TPS ≥50 and CRP >10) carried a high negative predictive value with a median PFS of 4.11 months (CI 95% 0.00-9.63), which was similar to patients with low PD-L1 (4.11 months, CI 95% 2.61-5.60).

conclusionsAdding plasma CRP levels to PD-L1 TPS significantly increased the predictive value of sole PD-L1. Furthermore, patients with high CRP beard little benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 therapies independent of PD-L1 score. The study highlights the combined evaluation of plasma CRP and PD-L1 TPS as a negative predictive marker for ICI therapies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinHumansPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinCRPICINSCLCPD-L1predictiveprognostic

Identifiers

PMID37329173
PMCPMC10469721
OpenAlexW4380985477

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.