Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37331814›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences2023

Direct conversion of a general antibody to its catalytic antibody and corresponding applications -Importance and role of Pro95 in CDR-3.

Emi Hifumi, Hiroaki Taguchi, Tamami Nonaka, Taizo Uda

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emi HifumiInstitute for Research Management, Oita University.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5123-3846
Hiroaki TaguchiFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Suzuka University of Medical Science.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-6380
Tamami NonakaResearch Center for GLOBAL/LOCAL Infectious Diseases, Oita University.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9673-4807
Taizo UdaInstitute for Research Management, Oita University.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8146-7902
Oita University · JPSuzuka University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catalytic antibodies possess unique features capable of both recognizing and enzymatically degrading antigens. Therefore, they are more beneficial than monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Catalytic antibodies exhibit the ability to degrade peptides, antigenic proteins, DNA, and physiologically active molecules. However, they have a significant drawback in terms of their production. The production of a desired catalytic antibody has extensive costs, in terms of time and effort. We herein describe an evolutionary method to produce a desired catalytic antibody via conversion of a general antibody by the deletion of Pro95, which resides in complementarity-determining region-3. As over thousands of mAbs have been produced since 1975, using the novel technology discussed herein, the catalytic feature cleaving the antigen can be conferred to the mAb. In this review article, we discussed in detail not only the role of Pro95 but also the unique features of the converted catalytic antibodies. This technique will accelerate research on therapeutic application of catalytic antibodies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, CatalyticAmino Acid SequenceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, CatalyticAntibodies, Monoclonalamyloid-betacatalytic antibodylight chainPD-1Pro95Tau

Identifiers

PMID37331814
PMCPMC10319470
OpenAlexW4381110625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.