Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37331928›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2023

Evaluation of visual acuity in dry AMD patients after microcurrent electrical stimulation.

Kevin M Parkinson, Eric C Sayre, Sheldon W Tobe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02540148 (Transpalpebral Micro-Current Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02540148 nacompletednot on this map

Transpalpebral Micro-Current Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Eye Machine Canada Inc.Ran2019 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsAge-Related (Dry) Macular DegenerationArmsNova Oculus™ Micro-current electrical stimulation, Nova Oculus™ Micro-current electrical stimulation - Sham treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treating patients with geographic atrophy: are we there yet?International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin M Parkinson, Coquitlam, Canada.
Eric C Sayre, Vancouver, Canada.
Sheldon W Tobe, Toronto, Canada. sheldon.tobe@sunnybrook.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7848-3872
Coquitlam College · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess micro current to improve vision for dry age-related macular degeneration. Dry age-related macular degeneration is a major cause of blindness, disability, and severe erosion of quality of life, throughout the world. Beyond nutritional supplementation, there is no approved therapy.

methodsThis was a prospective randomized sham controlled clinical trial for participants with confirmed dry AMD with documented visual loss. Participants were randomized three to one, to receive transpalpebral external micro current electrical stimulation with the MacuMira device. The Treatment group received four treatments in the first two weeks, and two further treatments at weeks 14 and 26. Differences in BCVA and contrast sensitivity (CS) were estimated with mixed-effects repeated measures analysis of variance.

resultsChange of visual acuity with ETDRS assessment of number of letters read (NLR) and contrast sensitivity at week 4 and 30, compared to the first visit, between 43 treatment and 19 sham control participants. The Sham Control group had NLR of 24.2 (SD 7.1) at baseline, 24.2 (SD 7.2) at 4 weeks, and 22.1 (SD7.4) at 30 weeks. The Treatment group had NLR of 19.6 (SD 8.9) at baseline, 27.6 (SD 9.1) at 4 weeks, and 27.8 (SD 8.4) at 30 weeks. The change in NLR from baseline in the Treatment compared to the Sham control group was 7.7 (95% CI 5.7, 9.7, p < 0.001) at 4 weeks and 10.4 (95% CI 7.8, 13.1, p < 0.001) at 30 weeks. There were similar benefits in CS.

conclusionsThis pilot study of transpalpebral microcurrent demonstrated improved visual measures and is very encouraging as a potential treatment for dry AMD.

trial registrationNCT02540148, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Macular degenerationMicrocurrentRetinaVisual loss

Identifiers

PMID37331928
PMCPMC10278316
OpenAlexW4381149570

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.