Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332175›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023

Validation of a clinically applicable device for fast and accurate quantification of blood volume.

Andreas Breenfeldt Andersen, Thomas C Bonne, Joar Hansen, Peter Oturai, Carsten Lundby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Blood volume deficit in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome assessed by semiautomated carbon monoxide rebreathing.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas Breenfeldt AndersenDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for Exercise Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3361-3009
Thomas C BonneDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joar HansenInnland University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.
Peter OturaiDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten LundbyInnland University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.
University of Inland Norway · NOAarhus University · DKRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Partnership for Clean Competition 100100R318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDetermination of blood volume (BV) using the dual-isotope (e.g.,

methodsWe investigated the reliability and accuracy of a semi-automated CO-rebreathing device by comparing it against the dual-isotope methodology and its ability to detect a known blood removal. In study A, BV was determined three times in ~2 h; twice using the device with rebreathing protocols lasting 2 (CO

resultsA good correlation was observed between both the CO-rebreathing protocols (r

conclusionThis study emphasizes that the semi-automated device accurately determines small changes (i.e., 2%) in BV and that a high correlation with the dual-isotope methodology exists. The findings are clinically relevant owing to the method's simple and fast nature (the absence of radioactive tracers and reduced time requirements, i.e., ~15 min vs. ~180 min) and the possibility for repeated measurements within a single day.

Indexed as

Blood VolumeHumansReproducibility of Resultscardiovascular diseasechronic kidney diseaseerythropoietin

Identifiers

PMID37332175
PMCPMC10388222
OpenAlexW4381158073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.