Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37332821›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Synthesis and Characterization of Silica, Silver-Silica, and Zinc Oxide-Silica Nanoparticles for Evaluation of Blood Biochemistry, Oxidative Stress, and Hepatotoxicity in Albino Rats.

Arooj Ali, Saba Saeed, Riaz Hussain, Gulnaz Afzal, Abu Baker Siddique, Gulnaz Parveen, Murtaza Hasan, Giovanni Caprioli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Arooj AliInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Physical & Mathematical Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, Pakistan.
Saba SaeedInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Physical & Mathematical Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, Pakistan.
Riaz HussainDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, Pakistan.
Gulnaz AfzalDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Chemical & Biological Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, Pakistan.
Abu Baker SiddiqueDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab 38000, Pakistan.
Gulnaz ParveenDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Women University Swabi, Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 23430, Pakistan.
Murtaza HasanDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemical & Biological Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab 63100, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-9173
Giovanni CaprioliChemistry Interdisciplinary Project (CHip), School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Camerino 62032, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-877X
Islamia University of Bahawalpur · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKUniversità di Camerino · ITUniversity of Swabi · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of nanoparticles (NPs) for biomedical applications has received a lot of attention for detailed study on pharmacokinetics prior to clinical application. In this study, pure C-SiO

Identifiers

PMID37332821
PMCPMC10269246
OpenAlexW4379055170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.