ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
A novel deep proteomic approach in human skeletal muscle unveils distinct molecular signatures affected by aging and resistance training.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the myofibrillar (MyoF) and non-myofibrillar (non-MyoF) proteomic profiles of the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle of younger (Y, 22±2 years old; n=5) and middle-aged participants (MA, 56±8 years old; n=6), and MA following eight weeks of knee extensor resistance training (RT, 2d/week). Shotgun/bottom-up proteomics in skeletal muscle typically yields wide protein abundance ranges that mask lowly expressed proteins. Thus, we adopted a novel approach whereby the MyoF and non-MyoF fractions were separately subjected to protein corona nanoparticle complex formation prior to digestion and Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. A total of 10,866 proteins (4,421 MyoF and 6,445 non-MyoF) were identified. Across all participants, the number of non-MyoF proteins detected averaged to be 5,645±266 (range: 4,888-5,987) and the number of MyoF proteins detected averaged to be 2,611±326 (range: 1,944-3,101). Differences in the non-MyoF (8.4%) and MyoF (2.5%) proteome were evident between age cohorts. Further, most of these age-related non-MyoF proteins (447/543) were more enriched in MA versus Y. Several biological processes in the non-MyoF fraction were predicted to be operative in MA versus Y including (but not limited to) increased cellular stress, mRNA splicing, translation elongation, and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Non-MyoF proteins associated with splicing and proteostasis were further interrogated, and in agreement with bioinformatics, alternative protein variants, spliceosome-associated proteins (snRNPs), and proteolysis-related targets were more abundant in MA versus Y. RT in MA non-significantly increased VL muscle cross-sectional area (+6.5%, p=0.066) and significantly increased knee extensor strength (+8.7%, p=0.048). However, RT modestly altered the MyoF (~0.3%, 11 upregulated and two downregulated proteins) and non-MyoF proteomes (~1.0%, 56 upregulated and eight downregulated proteins, p<0.01). Further, RT did not affect predicted biological processes in either fraction. Although participant numbers were limited, these preliminary results using a novel deep proteomic approach in skeletal muscle suggest that aging and RT predominantly affects protein abundances in the non-contractile protein pool. However, the marginal proteome adaptations occurring with RT suggest either: a) this may be an aging-associated phenomenon, b) more rigorous RT may stimulate more robust effects, or c) RT, regardless of age, subtly affects skeletal muscle protein abundances in the basal state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.