Evidence mapPaperPMID 37333737Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2023

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Eluting Stent: The Debate of Leave Nothing Behind.

Nicole Keefe, Trevor Shull, Lev Botea, Katharine McGinigle

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole KeefeDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Trevor ShullDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lev BoteaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Katharine McGinigleDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular techniques for peripheral artery disease have changed significantly in the past 10 years with advances in technology and data. Treatment of superficial femoral disease is complex secondary to the length, degree of calcification, high rate of chronic total occlusion, and areas of flexion within this vessel. Use of drug-coated devices has increased the interventionalist's toolbox with the objective to improve freedom from target lesion revascularization and primary patency. There remains debate as to which devices may reach these goals while also limiting overall morbidity and mortality. This article aims to highlight recent advances in the literature regarding the use of drug-coated devices.

Indexed as

bare metal stentdrug-coated balloondrug-eluting stentinterventional radiologypaclitaxelpercutaneous transluminal angioplastyplain-old balloon angioplasty

Identifiers

PMID37333737
PMCPMC10275675
OpenAlexW4380896444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.