Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37334137›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Fertilizer and herbicide alter nectar and pollen quality with consequences for pollinator floral choices.

Laura Russo, Fabian Ruedenauer, Angela Gronert, Isabelle Van de Vreken, Maryse Vanderplanck, Denis Michez, Alexandra Klein, Sara Leonhardt, Jane C Stout

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bee on Boron-Sufficient Boron Supply ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Laura RussoUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States of America.
Fabian RuedenauerTechnische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Angela GronertChair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Isabelle Van de VrekenUniversity of Liege, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium.
Maryse VanderplanckCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Denis MichezUniversity of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Alexandra KleinChair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sara LeonhardtTechnische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
Jane C StoutTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Technical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEGembloux Agro-Bio Tech · BEInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Mons · BEUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pollinating insects provide economically and ecologically valuable services, but are threatened by a variety of anthropogenic changes. The availability and quality of floral resources may be affected by anthropogenic land use. For example, flower-visiting insects in agroecosystems rely on weeds on field edges for foraging resources, but these weeds are often exposed to agrochemicals that may compromise the quality of their floral resources. Methods: We conducted complementary field and greenhouse experiments to evaluate the: (1) effect of low concentrations of agrochemical exposure on nectar and pollen quality and (2) relationship between floral resource quality and insect visitation. We applied the same agrochemcial treatments (low concentrations of fertilizer, low concentrations of herbicide, a combination of both, and a control of just water) to seven plant species in the field and greenhouse. We collected data on floral visitation by insects in the field experiment for two field seasons and collected pollen and nectar from focal plants in the greenhouse to avoid interfering with insect visitation in the field. Results: We found pollen amino acid concentrations were lower in plants exposed to low concentrations of herbicide, and pollen fatty acid concentrations were lower in plants exposed to low concentrations of fertilizer, while nectar amino acids were higher in plants exposed to low concentrations of either fertilizer or herbicide. Exposure to low fertilizer concentrations also increased the quantity of pollen and nectar produced per flower. The responses of plants exposed to the experimental treatments in the greenhouse helped explain insect visitation in the field study. The insect visitation rate correlated with nectar amino acids, pollen amino acids, and pollen fatty acids. An interaction between pollen protein and floral display suggested pollen amino acid concentrations drove insect preference among plant species when floral display sizes were large. We show that floral resource quality is sensitive to agrochemical exposure and that flower-visiting insects are sensitive to variation in floral resource quality.

Indexed as

HerbicidesPlant NectarAgrochemicalsAmino AcidsAnimalsFertilizersInsectaPlant WeedsPollenPollinationAgrochemicalsAmino AcidsFertilizersHerbicidesPlant NectarAgrochemicalsFloral resourcesNectar amino acidsNectar sugarsPlant-pollinator interactionsPollen amino acidsPollen fatty acidsPollilnator healthPollinator nutrition

Identifiers

PMID37334137
PMCPMC10269573
OpenAlexW4380371563

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.