Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37334750›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Social and healthcare professionals' experiences of end-of-life care planning and documentation in palliative care.

Anne Kuusisto, Kaija Saranto, Päivi Korhonen, Elina Haavisto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne KuusistoDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9950-1985
Kaija SarantoDepartment of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-1955
Päivi KorhonenDepartment of General Practice, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0244-4890
Elina HaavistoDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9747-1428
University of Turku · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore social and healthcare professionals' experiences of end-of-life (EOL) care planning and documentation in palliative care.

designA qualitative study with narrative methodology.

methodsA narrative method with interviews was used. Data were collected from purposively selected registered nurses (n = 18), practical nurses (n = 5), social workers (n = 5) and physicians (n = 5) working in palliative care unit in five hospitals in three hospital districts. Content analysis within narrative methodologies was undertaken.

resultsTwo main categories - patient-oriented EOL care planning and multi-professional EOL care planning documentation- were formed. Patient-oriented EOL care planning included treatment goals planning, disease treatment planning and EOL care setting planning. Multi-professional EOL care planning documentation included healthcare professionals' and social professionals' perspectives. Healthcare professionals' perspectives on EOL care planning documentation included benefits of structured documentation and poor support of electronic health record (EHR) for documentation. Social professionals' perspective on EOL care planning documentation included usefulness of multi-professional documentation and externality of social professionals in multi-professional documentation.

conclusionThe results of this interdisciplinary study demonstrated a gap between what healthcare professionals consider important in Advance Care Planning (ACP), that is, proactive, patient-oriented and multi-professional EOL care planning and the ability to access and document this in a useful and accessible way in the EHR. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Knowledge of the patient-centered EOL care planning and multi-professional documentation processes and their challenges are prerequisites for documentation to be supported by technology. REPORTING

methodThe Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was followed. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningTerminal CareDelivery of Health CareDocumentationHumansPalliative Carecare planningclinical social workdeathdocumentationelectronic health recordsend-of-lifehealthcare professionalspalliative care

Identifiers

PMID37334750
PMCPMC10416050
OpenAlexW4381157935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.