Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37335333›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2023

The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo.

Milagrosa López-Riego, Magdalena Płódowska, Milena Lis-Zajęcka, Kamila Jeziorska, Sylwia Tetela, Aneta Węgierek-Ciuk, Daniel Sobota, Janusz Braziewicz, Lovisa Lundholm, Halina Lisowska and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Milagrosa López-RiegoCentre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. milagrosa.lopezriego@su.se.ORCID 0000-0003-4674-8236
Magdalena PłódowskaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Milena Lis-ZajęckaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Kamila JeziorskaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Sylwia TetelaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Aneta Węgierek-CiukDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Daniel SobotaDepartment of Medical Physics, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Janusz BraziewiczDepartment of Medical Physics, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Lovisa LundholmCentre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Halina LisowskaDepartment of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Andrzej WojcikCentre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan Kochanowski University · PLStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidate ionising radiation exposure biomarkers must be validated in humans exposed in vivo. Blood from patients undergoing positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan (PET-CT) and skeletal scintigraphy (scintigraphy) was drawn before (0 h) and after (2 h) the procedure for correlation analyses of the response of selected biomarkers with radiation dose and other available patient information. FDXR, CDKN1A, BBC3, GADD45A, XPC, and MDM2 expression was determined by qRT-PCR, DNA damage (γH2AX) by flow cytometry, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels by flow cytometry using the 2', 7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate test in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). For ROS experiments, 0- and 2-h samples were additionally exposed to UVA to determine whether diagnostic irradiation conditioned the response to further oxidative insult. With some exceptions, radiological imaging induced weak γH2AX foci, ROS and gene expression fold changes, the latter with good coherence across genes within a patient. Diagnostic imaging did not influence oxidative stress in PBMC successively exposed to UVA. Correlation analyses with patient characteristics led to low correlation coefficient values. γH2AX fold change, which correlated positively with gene expression, presented a weak positive correlation with injected activity, indicating a radiation-induced subtle increase in DNA damage and subsequent activation of the DNA damage response pathway. The exposure discrimination potential of these biomarkers in the absence of control samples as frequently demanded in radiological emergencies, was assessed using raw data. These results suggest that the variability of the response in heterogeneous populations might complicate identifying individuals exposed to low radiation doses.

Indexed as

HistonesLeukocytes, MononuclearBiomarkersDNA DamageGene ExpressionHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyReactive Oxygen SpeciesBiomarkersHistonesReactive Oxygen SpeciesBloodDiagnostic imaging patientsGene expressionLymphocytesROSγH2AX foci

Identifiers

PMID37335333
PMCPMC10356679
OpenAlexW4381250371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.