Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37336543›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

'

Filipa Fareleira, Maria Raul Xavier, Filipa Tavares de Lima, Helena Sampaio Reis, Julia Velte, Carlos Martins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filipa FareleiraCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal up201607919@g.uporto.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-7312-2178
Maria Raul XavierUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Research Centre for Human Development, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2223-2000
Filipa Tavares de LimaFaculty of Education and Psychology, Universidade Católica Portuguesa - Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-5812
Helena Sampaio ReisFaculty of Education and Psychology, Universidade Católica Portuguesa - Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2920-183X
Julia VelteUnidade de Saúde Familiar AlphaMouro, Sintra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1185-2500
Carlos MartinsCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8561-5167
Universidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTAdministração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the experiences, needs and preferences of a group of parents regarding the parenting support received during prenatal and well-child care in the Portuguese National Health Service. DESIGN AND

settingWe undertook descriptive-interpretive qualitative research running multiple focus groups in Porto, Northern Portugal. PARTICIPANTS, DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Purposive sampling was used between April and November 2018. Focus groups were conducted with 11 parents of a 0-3 years old with well-child visits done in primary care units. Thematic analysis was performed in a broadly inductive coding strategy and findings are reported in accordance with Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.

resultsThree main themes were identified to describe parents' experience when participating in their children's healthcare: (1) logistics/delivery matter, including accessibility, organisation and provision of healthcare activities, unit setting and available equipment; (2) prenatal and well-child care: a relational place to communicate, with parents valuing a tripartite space for the baby, the family and the parent himself, where an available and caring health provider plays a major role and (3) parenting is challenging and looks for support, based on key points for providers to watch for and ask about, carefully explained and consensual among health providers.

conclusionThis study provides insight into parents' needs and healthcare practices that affect the parenting experience. To meet parents' preferences, sensitive health providers should guarantee a relational place to communicate and person-centredness, accounting for the whole family system to support healthy parenting collaboratively. Future studies are warranted to further strengthen the knowledge in the field of a population-based approach for parenting support.

Indexed as

Child CareParentingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParentsPortugalPregnancyQualitative ResearchState Medicinecommunity child healthpreventive medicineprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID37336543
PMCPMC10314500
OpenAlexW4381189976

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.