Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337399›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2023

Remimazolam versus propofol in combination with esketamine for surgical abortion: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Linli Yue, Xiaoling Ma, Na Li, Jing Chen, Jun Wang, Zhenzhen Wan, Lin Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Linli YueDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoling MaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China.
Na LiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4221-6075
Jing ChenSchool of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China.
Zhenzhen WanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China.
Lin YangSchool of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Hubei Provincial Women and Children's Hospital · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine with a short half-life, good efficacy, and safety profiles in general anesthesia. Combining esketamine with propofol (P + E) could reduce propofol consumption and injection pain. It is, however, unclear if a low dose of remimazolam co-administrated with esketamine (R + E) is comparable to the increasingly used P + E for surgical abortion with general anesthetic. We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of R + E and P + E. Two hundred patients scheduled for a surgical abortion were randomized to receive remimazolam 0.3 mg/kg plus esketamine 0.3 mg/kg (R + E), and propofol 2 mg/kg plus esketamine 0.3 mg/kg (P + E). Sedative effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the time to lose consciousness (LOC), recovery time, and successful sedation rate. Safety was assessed by hemodynamics and adverse events during and postoperation. The time to LOC and recovery time in R + E was 5 s shorter and 1 min longer than that in P + E, respectively (both p < 0.001). Success sedation rate did not differ between groups (p = 0.73). Bradycardia incidence and injection site pain were less frequent in the R + E group than that in the P + E group. More rash was observed in the R + E group compared with the P + E group (32% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), but all were mild (only chest rash) and resolved subsequently. Low dose of remimazolam when combined with esketamine has favorable profiles with rapid onset and recovery, but mild hemodynamic side effects and adverse events. It can be used as an alternative for surgical abortion with general anesthetic.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, GeneralExanthemaPropofolBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansKetaminePainPregnancyAnesthetics, GeneralBenzodiazepinesEsketamineKetaminePropofolremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID37337399
PMCPMC10499404
OpenAlexW4381309599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.