Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37337407›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes2023

Impact on glucometric variables and quality of life of the advanced hybrid closed-loop system in pediatric and adolescent type 1 diabetes.

Alfonso Lendínez-Jurado, Ana Gómez-Perea, Ana B Ariza-Jiménez, Leopoldo Tapia-Ceballos, Icía Becerra-Paz, María F Martos-Lirio, Fernando Moreno-Jabato, Isabel Leiva-Gea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Real-World Glucometric Outcomes of the MiniMed 780G Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Users with Type 1 Diabetes in Spain.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alfonso Lendínez-JuradoDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4408-1335
Ana Gómez-PereaDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-4212
Ana B Ariza-JiménezDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Leopoldo Tapia-CeballosDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4248-2645
Icía Becerra-PazDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.
María F Martos-LirioDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1018-3299
Fernando Moreno-JabatoInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.
Isabel Leiva-GeaDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-7253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, technological advances in the field of diabetes have revolutionized the management, prognosis, and quality of life of diabetes patients and their environment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of implementing the MiniMed 780G closed-loop system in a pediatric and adolescent population previously treated with a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump and intermittent glucose monitoring.

methodsData were collected from 28 patients with type 1 diabetes aged 6 to 17 years, with a follow-up of 6 months. We included both glucometric and quality of life variables, as well as quality of life in primary caregivers. Metabolic control variables were assessed at baseline (before system change) and at different cutoff points after initiation of the closed-loop system (48 hours, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months).

resultsTime in range 70-180 mg/dL increased from 59.44% at baseline to 74.29% in the first 48 hours after automation of the new system, and this improvement was maintained at the other cutoff points, as was time in hyperglycemia 180-250 mg/dL (24.44% at baseline to 18.96% at 48 hours) and >250 mg/dL (11.71% at baseline to 3.82% at 48 hours).

conclusionsOur study showed an improvement in time in range and in all time spent in hyperglycemia from the first 48 hours after the automation of the system, which was maintained at 6 months.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1HyperglycemiaAdolescentBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChildHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsQuality of LifeBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinadvanced hybrid closed-loopMiniMed 780GMiniMedTM 780Gpediatric type 1 diabetestime in hyperglycemiatime in range儿童1型糖尿病目标范围内时间高级混合闭环高血糖时间

Identifiers

PMID37337407
PMCPMC10415871

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.