Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37338518›Full record

ArticleAging2023

Significance of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-related genes in breast cancer: a multi-omics analysis.

Jiaheng Xie, Liang Chen, Dan Wu, Shengxuan Liu, Shengbin Pei, Qikai Tang, Yue Wang, Mengmeng Ou, Zhechen Zhu, Shujie Ruan and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Overview of high mobility group box 3 (HMGB3] protein.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025
    Review
  5. Liquid-liquid phase separation-related genes associated with prognosis, tumor microenvironment characteristics, and tumor cell features in bladder cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaheng XieDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Liang ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Conversion Therapy Center for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumors, First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Dan WuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210031, Jiangsu, China.
Shengxuan LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China.
Shengbin PeiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Qikai TangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Yue WangDepartment of Pathology, Basic Medical School, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China.
Mengmeng OuDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Zhechen ZhuDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Shujie RuanDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Ming WangDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Jingping ShiDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Nanjing Medical University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNAnhui Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of Jiaxing · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the role of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in cancer has been preliminarily explained. However, the significance of LLPS in breast cancer is unclear. In this study, single cell sequencing datasets GSE188600 and GSE198745 for breast cancer were downloaded from the GEO database. Transcriptome sequencing data for breast cancer were downloaded from UCSC database. We divided breast cancer cells into high-LLPS group and low-LLPS group by down dimension clustering analysis of single-cell sequencing data set, and obtained differentially expressed genes between the two groups. Subsequently, weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed on transcriptome sequencing data, and the module genes most associated with LLPS were obtained. COX regression and Lasso regression were performed and the prognostic model was constructed. Subsequently, survival analysis, principal component analysis, clinical correlation analysis, and nomogram construction were used to evaluate the significance of the prognostic model. Finally, cell experiments were used to verify the function of the model's key gene, PGAM1. We constructed a LLPS-related prognosis model consisting of nine genes: POLR3GL, PLAT, NDRG1, HMGB3, HSPH1, PSMD7, PDCD2, NONO and PGAM1. By calculating LLPS-related risk scores, breast cancer patients could be divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group having a significantly worse prognosis. Cell experiments showed that the activity, proliferation, invasion and healing ability of breast cancer cell lines were significantly decreased after knockdown of the key gene PGAM1 in the model. Our study provides a new idea for prognostic stratification of breast cancer and provides a novel marker: PGAM1.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCluster AnalysisDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMultiomicsPrognosisTranscription FactorsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsPDCD2 protein, humanTranscription Factorsbioinformaticsbreast cancerliquid-liquid phase separationPGAM1single cell sequencing analysis

Identifiers

PMID37338518
PMCPMC10333080
OpenAlexW4381251522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.