Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37340468›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2023

Comparison of the therapeutic effects between stem cells and exosomes in primary ovarian insufficiency: as promising as cells but different persistency and dosage.

Hang-Soo Park, Rishi Man Chugh, Jin Seok, Esra Cetin, Hanaa Mohammed, Hiba Siblini, Farzana Liakath Ali, Mohammad Mousaei Ghasroldasht, Hiba Alkelani, Amro Elsharoud and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Application of adult stem cells in obstetrics and gynecology: A scoping review.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hang-Soo ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Rishi Man ChughDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jin SeokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Esra CetinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Hanaa MohammedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Hiba SibliniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Farzana Liakath AliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Mohammad Mousaei GhasroldashtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Hiba AlkelaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Amro ElsharoudDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Mara UlinDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Sahar EsfandyariDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ayman Al-HendyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. aalhendy@BSD.Uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6512-603X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary ovarian insufficiency (POI) refers to the loss of ovarian function under the age of 40 and results in amenorrhea and infertility. Our previous studies have shown that transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC-derived exosomes in chemotherapy-induced POI mouse ovaries can reverse the POI and eventually achieve pregnancy. Based on our recent studies, MSC-derived exosomes have almost equal therapeutic potentials as transplanted MSCs. However, it is still unclear whether exosomes can completely replace MSCs in POI treatment. For the reliable application of cell-free treatment for POI patients using exosomes, there is a need to understand whether there is any outcome and effectiveness difference between MSC and MSC-derived exosome treatment.

methodsComparing the therapeutic effect of intravenous injection using MSCs and equal amounts of exosomes in a POI mouse model will reveal the difference between the two therapeutic resources. In this study, we induced POI in C57/BL6 mice by chemotherapy (CXT) using a standard protocol. We then injected four different doses of MSCs or equal amounts of commercialized MSC-derived exosomes by retro-orbital injection post-CXT.

resultAfter MSC/exosome treatment, tissue and serum samples were harvested to analyze molecular changes after treatment, while other mice in parallel experiments underwent breeding experiments to compare the restoration of fertility. Both the MSC- and exosome-treated groups had a restored estrous cycle and serum hormone levels compared to untreated POI mice. The pregnancy rate in the MSC-treated group was 60-100% after treatment, while the pregnancy rate in the exosome-treated group was 30-50% after treatment. Interestingly, in terms of long-term effects, MSC-treated mice still showed a 60-80% pregnancy rate in the second round of breeding, while the exosome-treated group became infertile again in the second round of breeding.

conclusionsAlthough there were some differences in the efficacy between MSC treatment and exosome treatment, both treatments were able to achieve pregnancy in the POI mouse model. In conclusion, we report that MSC-derived exosomes are a promising therapeutic option to restore ovarian function in POI conditions similar to treatment with MSCs.

Indexed as

ExosomesMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyAnimalsFemaleFertilityHumansMicePregnancyExosomeInfertilityLong-term effectMesenchymal stem cellPrimary ovarian insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID37340468
PMCPMC10283237

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.