Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37343556›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023

Functional organization of visual responses in the octopus optic lobe.

Judit R Pungor, V Angelique Allen, Jeremea O Songco-Casey, Cristopher M Niell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Visual computation in the cephalopod brain.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A non-invasive method to genotype cephalopod sex by quantitative PCR.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judit R PungorDepartment of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405, USA. Electronic address: jpungor@uoregon.edu.
V Angelique AllenDepartment of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405, USA.
Jeremea O Songco-CaseyDepartment of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405, USA.
Cristopher M NiellDepartment of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405, USA. Electronic address: cniell@uoregon.edu.
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Neural coding and functional organization of the octopus visual systemRF1NS118466 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2020 to 2021
$1.2M
Neural coding and functional organization of the octopus visual systemR01NS118466 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2023 to 2024
$695k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118466NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS118466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cephalopods are highly visual animals with camera-type eyes, large brains, and a rich repertoire of visually guided behaviors. However, the cephalopod brain evolved independently from those of other highly visual species, such as vertebrates; therefore, the neural circuits that process sensory information are profoundly different. It is largely unknown how their powerful but unique visual system functions, as there have been no direct neural measurements of visual responses in the cephalopod brain. In this study, we used two-photon calcium imaging to record visually evoked responses in the primary visual processing center of the octopus central brain, the optic lobe, to determine how basic features of the visual scene are represented and organized. We found spatially localized receptive fields for light (ON) and dark (OFF) stimuli, which were retinotopically organized across the optic lobe, demonstrating a hallmark of visual system organization shared across many species. An examination of these responses revealed transformations of the visual representation across the layers of the optic lobe, including the emergence of the OFF pathway and increased size selectivity. We also identified asymmetries in the spatial processing of ON and OFF stimuli, which suggest unique circuit mechanisms for form processing that may have evolved to suit the specific demands of processing an underwater visual scene. This study provides insight into the neural processing and functional organization of the octopus visual system, highlighting both shared and unique aspects, and lays a foundation for future studies of the neural circuits that mediate visual processing and behavior in cephalopods.

Indexed as

OctopodiformesAnimalsEyeNervous SystemVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptioncephalopodecological visionluminancereceptive fieldsretinotopy

Identifiers

PMID37343556
PMCPMC11056276
OpenAlexW4381432353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.